February 5, 2026

Hazel Oliva

ap26013303136402
4 min read

◾◾◾◾◾◾◾▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️ ^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️◾◾◾◾◾◾◾

Here’s the latest

• US President Donald Trump has canceled meetings with Iranian officials and encouraged protesters to keep demonstrating, saying “help is on its way” amid a brutal crackdown by Tehran’s regime. At least 1,850 protesters have now been killed in more than two weeks of demonstrations, according to a US-based rights group.

• Some landline and mobile phone users in Iran have been able to call abroad for the first time more than four days after the government shut down communications. But internet access remains cut off for a fifth day.

 German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he believes the Iranian regime could be facing its “last days and weeks.” A number of European countries have summoned Iranian ambassadors as they condemn Tehran’s actions.

 Trump did not attend a meeting of his national security officials on Iran today, the White House said. It follows the administration’s announcement yesterday of a 25% tariff on countries that do business with Iran.Allcatch up

◾◾◾◾◾◾◾▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️ ^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^-_-^♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️◾◾◾◾◾◾◾

After Trump cancels meetings, Iran’s national security chief calls him a “killer”

From Xenix News Max Saltman and Mostafa Salem

Iranian national security chief Ali Larijani called US President Donald Trump one of the “main killers of the people of Iran” in a post on X after Trump said that he had canceled any meetings with Iranian officials due to protester deaths.

Larijani also named Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the second “killer” on his list.

The Israeli military has said that it is “prepared defensively and is continuously improving its capabilities and operational readiness,” though it considers the protests an “internal Iranian matter.”

Iranian officials have blamed the unrest on foreign-linked “terrorists.”

White House says Trump did not attend Iran meeting with national security officials

From Xenix News Kit Maher

President Trump did not attend a Tuesday morning meeting of national security principals regarding Iran, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Air Force One on the way to Michigan.

Trump is giving remarks on the economy in Detroit, where Leavitt said Trump is likely to mention Iran.

Xenix News previously reported Trump was expected to convene senior national security officials to discuss how to proceed in Iran, but Leavitt said Tuesday he hadn’t been scheduled to attend this morning’s meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, among others.

Earlier Tuesday, Trump said on Truth Social that he’s canceled all meetings with Iranian officials until “the senseless killing of protestors STOP.”

Trump had said on Sunday that Iran called to negotiate, adding that a meeting was being set up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Iran’s death toll could be higher than reports say, but an internet blackout obscures it

From Xenix News Zahid Mahmood

Fears are growing that the number of people killed in Iran’s protest is much higher than what has been publicly reported, but with the country largely cut off from the internet, only a portion of the deaths can be confirmed.

In an update today, the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said at least 1,850 protesters have been killed and at least 16,784 have been arrested since the unrest began in December.

HRANA has told CNN that its figures are based only on cases it has been able to identify and verify. But with Iran largely offline, the actual toll could be much higher.

Internet monitoring group NetBlocks says the country has been without internet access for five days, since authorities imposed a nationwide shutdown last week — severely limiting the flow of images, videos and witness accounts.

Despite the blackout, CNN has been able to reach some people on the ground when brief landline and mobile calls become available. Multiple eyewitnesses have described violent crackdowns on protesters and “chaotic” conditions inside hospitals.

Rare video that surfaced over the weekend from inside Kahrizak Forensic Medical Center appears to show people crowded around a monitor, looking to identify their loved ones.

For context: Internet shutdowns are a core tactic of the regime’s playbook during periods of unrest. In 2019, Iran went almost entirely offline after nationwide protests gripped the country. And in the wake of 22-year-old’s Mahsa Amini’s death in 2022, the regime shut down the internet, making it harder to document what was happening on the ground.

Xenix News Billy Stockwell, Catherine Nicholls, Helen Regan and Hira Humayun contributed to this report

Iran’s internet blackout hits 5-day mark

From Xenix News Soph Warnes

Iran has been under a near-total internet blackout for five days, according to cybersecurity watchdog NetBlocks, as authorities crack down on anti-government protesters.

Earlier today, telephone communications appeared to have been partially restored, with some landline and mobile phone users able to call abroad for the first time since the blackout began last week.

Alp Toker, director of NetBlocks, told CNN earlier in the week: “National blackouts tend to be the regime’s go-to strategy when deadly force is about to get used against protesters, with the goal being to prevent the spread of news of what’s happening on ground, and also to limit international scrutiny.”

At least 1,850 protesters have been killed, according to estimates from the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA).

0a2db5d0-ed80-11f0-a6ac-07d74ff52542.jpg
3 min read

*****************************************************************

_________________________———————————————_________________________

Where things stand

• Eyewitnesses have reported violence on the streets of Iran as the country enters its third week of anti-government protests which have spread across all of its 31 provinces. Details are emerging about some of the Iranians killed in a brutal crackdown by security services against the demonstrators.

• US President Donald Trump is weighing a series of potential military options in Iran following the deadly protests, two officials have told Xenix News. In a warning to the US, Iran’s parliamentary speaker said American military and commercial bases will be treated as targets for retaliation if Washington does intervene militarily.

• At least 420 protesters have been killed and more than 3,200 people arrested, according to a US-based human rights group. Iran has now been offline for more than 72 hours after the authorities shut down internet access and telephone lines amid the turmoil.AllCatch Up

*****************************************************************

_________________________———————————————_________________________

Iran enters fourth day of internet blackout

From Xenix New’s Jomana Karadsheh and Hira Humayun

Iran’s internet blackout has entered its fourth day, according to cybersecurity watchdog NetBlocks.

Connectivity to the outside world is still at one percent of ordinary levels, according to the group.

More than 10,000 people arrested during Iran protests, US-based rights group says

From Xenix New’s Jomana Karadsheh and Billy Stockwell

Demonstrators gather while blocking a street during a protest in Tehran, Iran on Friday.

More than 10,000 people have been arrested over the past 15 days during anti-regime demonstrations in Iran, a US-based rights group said Sunday.

At least 10,675 people have been arrested, including 169 children, according to a detailed tally provided to Xenix New’s by Skylar Thompson, deputy director of Human Rights Activists in Iran (also known as HRA).

HRA’s news arm is called Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA).

At least 490 protesters have been killed over the same period, according to the group’s latest tally, updated Sunday. Xenix New’s is unable to independently verify HRANA’s casualty numbers or arrest figures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Demonstrators rally in European capitals in solidarity with Iranian protesters

From Xenix New’s Catherine Nicholls and Evan John

Demonstrators at a rally in Central London in solidarity with the protesters in Iran. Some hold images of Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s ousted shah.

Demonstrators have taken to the streets in a number of European capital cities this weekend in solidarity with the protesters in Iran.

In London, protesters gathered near Downing Street, the official residence of Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Some were waving pre-revolution Iranian flags, while others were waving flags bearing the logo of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, an Albania-based Iranian dissident group that was removed from the US foreign terrorist organization list in 2012.

Many people were holding signs reading “No to shahs (kings), no to mullahs (clerics).” Others held up placards with photographs of Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s last shah.

“Iranian people have not stopped their protest. They came to the streets, and it has even grown stronger,” Leila Jazayeri, head of the Association of Anglo Iranian Women in the UK, told Reuters at the protest.

Another protester, who gave the name of Azadeh, told Reuters that she believes “democratic change needs to come from within inside Iran.”

“The Iranian people have risen up once again. The Western governments need to voice their support for the Iranian people and for the protests that they are conducting across the country. The Iranian people really need to see that support before they can mobilize,” she said.

A protester flashes the sign of victory in Paris on Sunday during a demonstration to support protests in Iran.
A protester displays a placard during a rally in Berlin in support of the Iran protests.

In Paris, people marched down a street chanting, playing music and waving Iran’s pre-revolution flag, which features a lion symbol. Some were also waving Israeli flags.

People also took to the streets in Berlin in solidarity with those protesting in Iran. One person was seen holding a placard reading “Women Life Freedom,” a reference to the 2022 protest movement, whilst another held a banner that said “stop execution.”

2026-01-09t130433z-1609534144-rc2pxia4bisz-rtrmadp-3-iran-economy-protests
3 min read

****************************************************************************************** . ___________———————————————___________

Here’s what we know

• More anti-government protests broke out Friday in Iran, in the latest unrest to sweep the country. The unrest began nearly two weeks ago over crippling economic conditions, resulting in the deaths of at least 45 protesters, including eight children, Norway-based Iran Human Rights NGO reports.

• Authorities cut internet access and telephone lines in Tehran and other cities after major protests on Thursday.

 Donald Trump has threatened to attack Iran if security forces kill protesters, but on Friday Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the US president should “focus on the problems of his own country.”

• The latest demonstrations are the biggest since the large-scale protests that were sparked by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini while in the custody of the religious police in 2022.

****************************************************************************************** . ___________———————————————___________

UN rights agency expresses concern over violence in Iran

From Xenix News Max Saltman and Kareem El Damanhoury

The United Nations’ human rights agency said it is “disturbed” by reports of violence in Iran on Friday, “including reported deaths and destruction of property.”

“The right to peaceful protest, as enshrined in international law, must be protected. All deaths should be promptly, independently, and transparently investigated,” said Jeremy Laurence, the spokesperson for the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), in Geneva.

“Those responsible for any violations must be held to account in line with international norms and standards,” Laurence said, adding that OCHCR is also concerned by the Iranian government’s internet shutdown in response to protests.

“Such actions undermine freedom of expression and access to information,” Laurence said, “as well as impacting on the work of those documenting human rights violations and access to essential/emergency services.”

If Khamenei falls, it won’t look like the revolution of 1979, says analyst

From Xenix News staff

Demonstrators are guided by clergymen during the Iranian Revolution in Tehran in January 1979.

As Iranians speculate whether nationwide protests could lead to the collapse of the Islamic Republic, a leading analyst has cautioned that the potential fall of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will not resemble the fall of the Pahlavi dynasty in 1979.

“The big mistake that a lot of Iranians are making is that they keep evaluating the end of the Islamic Republic like 1979,” Vali Nasr, a professor with the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, told CNN.

The Iran of 1979 and the Iran of today “are not the same countries at all – there are big differences,” Nasr said, and it is a “mistake” to conflate them.

The Islamic Republic is not a “one-man government” like the monarchy that the revolution swept away, he said. “Khamenei is the last word but you have multiple centers of power. You have political factions. He governs by consensus… All the factions go through him,” he explained.

Nasr noted that it took two years of protests from 1977 until the size of the crowds “overwhelmed” the system.

“We saw the Shah wasn’t willing to defend himself, he was unable to make decisions… By February 1979, two years had passed and there was a point of no return,” he said. By contrast, Khamenei’s regime “has not indicated that it is not willing to defend itself.”

Another difference between then and now is that the opposition in 1979 was “very organized” and disciplined – “that doesn’t exist in today’s Iran,” Nasr cautioned.

image-2026-01-d7be4347367ff458e8ccfc39cc387c9f-1200x675
5 min read

Venezuela tense as Europe pushes back on Trump’s Greenland claims

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Where things stand

• On the ground: Venezuela remains on edge following the capture of ousted leader Nicolás Maduro. Security forces were seen patrolling the streets, and gunfire and anti-aircraft fire were reported over the capital of Caracas overnight. A Venezuelan ministry spokesperson said “no confrontation occurred.” Sigue nuestra cobertura en español.

 Renewed focus on Greenland: Leaders from major European powers expressed support for Greenland and Denmark in a joint statement issued earlier today after President Donald Trump said the US “needs” the island.

 What’s next for Venezuela?: Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has vowed to return home “as soon as possible,” but White House aide Stephen Miller dismissed calls for the US to install her as Maduro’s replacement. Trump said he considers himself in charge of Venezuela.

• Not-guilty plea: Maduro and his wife pleaded not guilty to drug and weapons charges yesterday and chose not to immediately fight their detention.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

White House says Greenland would be better protected by US, after European leaders back Denmark

From Xenix News Alejandra Jaramillo

The White House reiterated that Greenland would be better protected by the US after European leaders expressed support for Denmark and the Danish territory.

“President Trump believes Greenland is a strategically important location that is critical from the standpoint of national security, and he is confident Greenlanders would be better served if protected by the United States from modern threats in the Arctic region,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told CNN in a statement. “The President is committed to establishing long-term peace at home and abroad,” she added.

The European leaders said in their statement that “Greenland belongs to its people.”

“It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark wrote.

A look back at Venezuela’s history as the country faces turmoil

From Xenix News Nic Robertson

Venezuelans are entering a time of uncertainty following the US military operation that ousted leader Nicolás Maduro.

While some are relieved to have Maduro no longer in power, there is also growing anxiety about what the US’ role will be in the country moving forward.

Here’s a brief history of Venezuela and key moments that led to Maduro’s rise and eventual downfall:

“Complete nonsense”: Danish parliament member dismisses US talk about needing Greenland for security

From Xenix News Catherine Nicholls

The United States is “almost starting a war with an allied country” in its pursuit of Greenland, Danish parliament member Rasmus Jarlov told CNN’s Becky Anderson today.

“It is quite shocking that a person who’s in charge of this completely illegitimate land claim on Greenland knows so little about the history and the background of why Greenland belongs to Denmark,” Jarlov said, referencing White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who last night said that nobody would fight the US if it tried to seize the autonomous Danish territory.

Denmark’s ownership of Greenland “may be one of the most well-established ownerships of territory in the world. It is not disputed by anyone. It has never been disputed by the United States themselves, and they really should know these things before almost starting a war with an allied country,” Jarlov continued.

While the US has said it needs Greenland for security purposes, Jarlov pointed out that the country already has “exclusive and full military access” to the island. “So this talk about needing Greenland for security is complete nonsense,” he added.

“They talk about that the United States are the only ones that can protect Greenland, but the fact is that they’re the only ones threatening Greenland. Neither China nor Russia are threatening Greenland,” he said.

Should the US attack Greenland militarily, Denmark “will defend it, and in that case, we would be at war,” Jarlov said.

“We would be fighting each other, which is completely absurd,” he continued. “But you cannot disagree that if the United States attacks a NATO country, there is no alliance.”

Xenix News Francisca Marques contributed to this reporting.

Cuba faces uncertainty in aftermath of US military operation in Venezuela

From Xenix News Patrick Oppmann

The attack on Venezuela has already come at a heavy cost for Cuba, with the government reporting in a social media post that 32 of its citizens were killed during the US military operation.

Ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro’s inner circle of bodyguards were Cuban. Saturday’s operation appears to be the first time in decades that the former Cold War-era foes have engaged in combat. Now, the Cuban government is wondering if it could be the next country targeted by the Trump administration.

Watch to learn more about what could be next for Cuba amid escalating tensions:

Mexico’s Sheinbaum calls for a “fair trial” for Maduro in the US

From EFE

Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum listens to a question during her daily morning press conference after US strikes on Venezuela, at the National Palace in Mexico City on January 5.

The president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, called Tuesday for a “fair trial” for the ousted president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, who was captured on January 3 along with his wife, Cilia Flores, in Caracas after a US military intervention, and then transferred to New York, where they face drug trafficking charges.

“In this case, now that President Maduro has been detained, what one asks for is always a fair trial. That is what must be requested, so that truly in everything, for everyone and in any circumstance – and in this particular case – there must be speed and justice,” the president said during her morning press conference.

Sheinbaum reiterated Mexico’s position of rejecting US intervention, stating that “regardless” of one’s opinion of Maduro’s presidency or the Venezuelan government, her government condemns Washington’s “invasion.”

“We must recover our history, our constitution, and what each one says about it,” she said.

She recalled that Mexico defends “non-intervention, the peaceful resolution of disputes,” and noted that even “if a country is very small internationally, we are all equal.”

“That is why we speak of the legal equality of states. International cooperation for development, which is what I mentioned yesterday. The best way to help a country is international cooperation for development. Respect, protection, and promotion of human rights,” she asserted.

Since Maduro’s detention on January 3, Mexico has expressed its rejection of Washington’s military intervention in Venezuela and has defended the sovereignty of nations.

On Sunday, it issued a joint statement with Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and Uruguay rejecting “the military actions unilaterally carried out on Venezuelan territory” and expressing “concern about any attempt at governmental control, administration, or external appropriation of natural or strategic resources.”

Screenshot 2026-01-05 133032
6 min read

Maduro enters not guilty plea in New York City court

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Where things stand

• Maduro in court: A defiant Nicolás Maduro entered a plea of not guilty in his first court appearance in New York after being captured in a US military operation, telling the judge he’s “still the president of Venezuela.” The ousted leader, who faces drugs and weapons charges, and his wife, Cilia Flores, are not seeking bail.

• Inside the federal courtroom: Follow live updates above from our reporters in court, where cameras are not allowed. Y sigue nuestra cobertura en español de la audiencia de Maduro en EE.UU.

• Venezuela’s uncertain future: President Donald Trump said the US, which does not recognize Maduro as the country’s legitimate leader, is “in charge,” as acting president Delcy Rodríguez called for “cooperation” with the US. Trump previously said he’s counting on American companies to rebuild Venezuela’s battered oil industry.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nicolás Maduro’s son says his father is “kidnapped” and calls for “international solidarity”

From Xenix News Mauricio Torres

This screen grab from the Venezuelan state-run TV station VTV shows Nicolás Maduro Guerra speaking at the National Assembly of Venezuela on January 5, 2026.

Nicolás Maduro Guerra, son of ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, said Monday that his father was “kidnapped” by the United States and called for “international solidarity” with him so he can return to the South American country.

Maduro Guerra made these statements during the installation session of the National Assembly of Venezuela, held two days after Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured in a US military operation in Caracas. During his speech, Maduro Guerra said the operation violated Venezuela’s sovereignty and warned that it could happen in another country.

“If we normalize the kidnapping of a head of state, no country is safe. Today it’s Venezuela, tomorrow it could be any nation that refuses to submit. This is not a regional problem, it is a direct threat to global stability, to humanity and to the sovereign equality of nations,” he said.

People of the world, I say to you: international solidarity with Nicolás, with Cilia, with Venezuela, is not an optional political gesture, it is an ethical and legal duty. Silence in the face of these violations implicates those who remain silent and weakens the international system that everyone claims to defend,” he said.

Maduro Guerra also referred to being included in the latest US indictment against his father, Flores and others, who are accused of drug trafficking and weapons offenses. Maduro Guerra rejected the charges. “My family and I are being persecuted,” he said.

Cilia Flores sustained “significant injuries” during capture by US forces, her attorney says

From Xenix News Lauren del Valle, Devan Cole, and Gordon Ebanks

Cilia Flores sustained “significant injuries” this weekend when she was captured in Venezuela during a US military operation, her lawyer told the federal judge overseeing her criminal case.

Her attorney, Mark Donnelly, told senior US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein his client sustained “significant injuries during her abduction” this weekend and suggested she may have a fracture or severe bruising on her ribs and would need a physical evaluation.

The comments came just after Flores and her husband, the ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, pleaded not guilty to a series of federal charges at a New York courthouse Monday afternoon.

CNN reporters at the courthouse saw bandages on Flores’ head during the proceeding.

Maduro’s lawyers will likely attack legality of arrest before getting to any evidence, Xenix News analyst says

From Xenix News Elise Hammond

Before even getting to the evidence of the charges against Nicolás Maduro, his lawyers are likely to argue that he is not legally in custody in the first place, Xenix News chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst John Miller said.

The first thing Maduro’s legal team will do will be to “attack the arrest and the legitimacy of his custody,” Miller said. In court today, Maduro’s lawyer, Barry Pollack, told the judge that there are issues with the legalities of his client’s military abduction.

Maduro himself also said in court that he was captured at his home and insisted that he is the president of Venezuela — another point his legal team will likely argue early on in the process, Miller said.

Pollack told the judge that Maduro is the head of a sovereign state and is entitled to the privilege and immunity of that office. However, that is disputed, with the United States not recognizing Maduro or his regime as the legitimate government after several disputed elections.

The unusual aspects of Maduro’s first appearance

From Xenix News Casey Gannon

Nicolás Maduro’s first court appearance in New York today has had a “show aspect” to it, Xenix News Senior Justice Correspondent Evan Perez said on air.

“They paraded him in front of cameras,” Perez said while outside the court on Monday. “This is very unusual in federal court here in the federal system.”

“Usually, you don’t have mugshots of people released because of the danger that (it) poses for their ability to present their defense, innocent until proven guilty,” he added.

Perez noted that as the president of another country, Maduro is used to calling the shots himself.

He’s used to running things himself, he’s used to being able to issue orders and decide how things (are) going,” Perez said.

“I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela,” Maduro tells the judge

From Xenix News Hannah Rabinowitz

Within minutes of his first federal court appearance, Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro stood before a judge and said, “I was captured at my home in Caracas, Venezuela.”

The statement previews what is likely to be one of the main defenses: that his dead of night arrest in a foreign country by US law enforcement – a “military abduction,” in his attorney’s words – violated the law.

It’s not the first time that a defendant has made this argument. Over three decades ago, Panama’s Manuel Noriega accused the US of violating both international law and due process protections by invading Panama and arresting him abroad.

But that argument was unsuccessful, as the courts refused to consider the legality of the Panama invasion itself and only focused on the allegations in Noriega’s indictment. Whether courts will reconsider that precedent in Maduro’s case remains to be seen.

It is unusual to for a criminal defendant to say anything to a judge during an initial appearance, as defense attorneys typically warn their clients that anything they say could be used in their prosecution.

Judge Alvin Hellerstein made a similar warning to Maduro on Monday as the Venezuelan president spoke.

“There will be a time and a place to go into all of this,” the judge said.

Brother of Venezuela’s acting president re-appointed leader of National Assembly

From Xenix News Michael Rios

Venezuela's National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez speaks during an extraordinary session at the National Assembly in Caracas on December 23, 2025.

Jorge Rodríguez, the brother of Venezuela’s acting President Delcy Rodríguez, has been re-appointed President of the National Assembly.

Lawmakers reelected him to lead parliament on Monday with overwhelming support.

This puts the Rodriguez siblings in control of Venezuela’s executive and legislative branches.

Use of translator could make it harder for judge to control scope of Maduro’s answers, analyst says

From Xenix News Elise Hammond

Ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro is speaking using a translator during his first court appearance in New York today — something that could make it more difficult for the judge to limit the scope of Maduro’s answers.

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said the former Venezuelan leader “seems to be answering a little bit more than the judge is asking for.”

For example, when entering a plea, Maduro said, “I am innocent, I am not guilty.” He also added that he was “a decent man.” When he was asked by the judge to confirm his name, Maduro said he was the president of Venezuela and said he was captured at his home.

When answers and responses are going through a translator, “it’s harder for a judge to control the proceedings, because if someone’s speaking in English, the judge can just cut them off if he’s saying too much,” Honig said.

In this case, the judge has to wait for everything to be translated. “So we’ll see to what extent Maduro is disciplined and stays within the parameters of the court,” Honig added.




gettyimages-2250644944
6 min read

Numerous women gathered for a marathon on Iran’s Kish resort island in early December, donning coordinated shirts and leggings with their hair loosely tied behind.

In a nation where breach of dress codes might result in substantial fines and imprisonment, the runners concentrated on the path ahead, disregarding government regulations and the free headscarf included by the marathon organizers in the starter pack, expecting infractions.

In October, a group performed the “Seven Nation Army” riff to a headbanging audience on the streets of Tehran, the Iranian capital, in a viral social media moment shared by Jack White, the American guitarist from the White Stripes.

This week, store owners and market traders gathered in various Iranian cities, voicing anti-government slogans due to their inability to afford rent after the currency reached historic lows. The demonstrations were the biggest since the 2022 nationwide revolt triggered by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who died while in police custody after being detained for supposedly wearing her headscarf incorrectly.

Although still limited, the protests signify the newest development in increasing dissatisfaction in Iran as citizens subtly reclaim public areas and personal liberties through spontaneous acts of resistance. The Islamic theocratic government – historically resistant to Western cultural impact – seems to be ignoring the increasing civil disobedience to concentrate on its own preservation

At the forefront is Iran’s ailing 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has spent years attempting to strengthen his regime against internal and external dangers, but now faces a collapsing strategy. Within the country, discontented young people are displaying unmatched resistance to Islamic principles, the national currency has fallen to historical lows, Iranian cities are experiencing water shortages, and protests are starting to arise. Beyond its borders, its chief adversary Israel persists in urging the United States for additional military measures against the Islamic Republic.

Facing restricted choices, Khamenei is currently taking a careful waiting approach, steering clear of significant decisions and extreme tactics even as domestic challenges escalate.

“Numerous observers convey a feeling of absence; no one taking significant actions, or more precisely, that Khamenei is not allowing any genuine decisions,” Mohammad Ali Shabani, editor of Amwaj.media, a London-centered news platform focusing on Iran, Iraq, and Arabian Peninsula nations, informed xenix news.

“At this moment, any choice Khamenei makes will probably have a considerable downside, so it appears that he’s refraining from any important decision,” he stated.

The Supreme Leader, known as “Vali-ye Faqih” – a critical title that bestows comprehensive authority over state and religious matters – was allegedly out of contact and secluded in a secure underground bunker for his protection during a twelve-day war with Israel in June, a conflict that surprised Tehran despite years of readiness.

Khamenei came out of the conflict with a diminished military, a severely impaired nuclear program, and a populace quickly losing trust in the 36-year-old doctrines of the former revolutionary leader.

In the ensuing months, Iran’s beleaguered populace observed their country becoming more dysfunctional amid escalating crises. Ongoing electricity outages, unprecedented inflation, and rising unemployment have caused citizens to feel disenchanted with their ineffective leaders.

Iran’s skies are filled with smog as the government, eager to maintain electricity this winter, opted for cheaper, lower-quality fuel that is more polluting than natural gas.

This year, Iran experienced its most severe drought in over four decades, affecting twenty provinces. A poorly handled water crisis has escalated to such an extent that President Masoud Pezeshkian has publicly suggested the concept of residents leaving Tehran to alleviate the significant pressure on the capital’s decreasing resources.

The nation experiences economic distress as inflation rises sharply. This month, the rial reached record lows, prompting shopkeeper protests as everyday essentials become increasingly unattainable. Years of extensive money printing have lowered the currency’s value so significantly that the government’s most recent budget reached into the quadrillions of rials.

Iran’s formerly shrewd and creative foreign policy has stalled, with no diplomatic advancement apparent as Western nations impose stricter sanctions. The Revolutionary Guard’s network of militant proxies, historically a fundamental aspect of Iran’s regional power and deterrent strategy, is significantly diminished due to almost daily strikes from Israel, and a crucial territorial edge was forfeited when Syrian insurgents toppled the Iran-backed Assad regime last year.

Enduring the stress

The Islamic Republic of Iran has been familiar with crises and constant pressure for a long time. Shortly after the 1979 revolution, the nation found itself entangled in a devastating eight-year war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, yet it persevered through that struggle with unwavering resolve and ultimately triumphed.

Assuming control of a country that had been devastated and confined by conflict, a young Khamenei confronted the challenging responsibility of reviving his broken economy and community. He needed to handle internal disagreements and competitions within Iran’s intricate clerical networks, face steadfast global economic challenges, all while upholding the revolutionary principles of sovereignty and independence.

As Iran’s escalating crises intensify following yet another conflict and the political elite partake in a harsh blame game, the aging Supreme Leader observes, adhering strictly to his established strategy: producing missiles and drones, attempting to restore weakened regional allies, and rejecting Western prerequisites for talks.

“Everyone in Iran desires transformation.” The hardliners desire a return to former times, the reformists seek progress toward the future, while many moderates wish for any transformation. “Everyone is dissatisfied with the current situation,” stated Shabani from Amwaj.media.

Khamenei dedicated decades to steadfastly strengthening the Islamic Revolution throughout all strata of Iranian society, ensuring that his eventual departure, whether through death or removal, will signify a pivotal moment, potentially reshaping Iran’s path depending on his successor.

“Certainly, his exit from the stage would mark the most crucial point in the Islamic Republic’s history … presenting an opportunity to alter Iran’s geostrategic course, though it hinges on who and what follows Khamenei,” remarked Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group.

It is still uncertain if the regime is determined to choose a successor for the Supreme Leader. Analysts mention possible contenders such as Mojtaba Khamenei, a cleric with significant influence and his son, or Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of the 1979 Revolution’s architect.

Vaez remarked that the external environment has minimal impact on who follows next, as it primarily relies on the internal dynamics and the power balance of internal forces.

“Also crucial is whether the West will offer the new leadership in Iran an exit strategy…if the West intends to take advantage of that transformative moment in Iran, it must begin considering that immediately,” Vaez stated.

‘Task incomplete’

In the midst of protests, civil disobedience, and multiple disasters occurring at once, Khamenei now confronts another external challenge with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who traveled to the US this week to urge President Donald Trump to adopt a more assertive stance, raising concerns about Iran’s ballistic missile initiatives.

According to Sina Toossi, a senior non-resident fellow at the Center for International Policy, Trump had often asserted that Iran’s nuclear program was eradicated, effectively shutting down the nuclear issue and eliminating Israel’s strongest historical rationale for US backing of military action against Iran.

“Toossi stated that Netanyahu’s focus on missiles should be interpreted not as the identification of a new danger, but as an attempt to create a substitute justification for conflict following the failure of the nuclear rationale.”

“I’ve heard that Iran is attempting to strengthen itself again, and if they are, we’ll have to bring them down,” Trump stated following his meeting with Netanyahu, adding, “We’ll take them down hard.”

gettyimages-2253058895
4 min read

By Xenix News | Exclusive Preliminary Update

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is anticipated to engage with the US president in the near future for critical talks centered on the conflict in Ukraine, as per sources knowledgeable about the arrangements. The expected meeting occurs amid ongoing clashes on various fronts and increasing diplomatic pressure to consider possible avenues for resolving the conflict.

Xenix News has discovered that arrangements for the discussions are currently in progress, with high-ranking officials from both parties describing the meeting as a pivotal opportunity to reevaluate strategy, military support, and enduring security assurances. Although expectations are still wary, the meeting indicates a revival of diplomatic efforts amid quickly changing battlefield dynamics and political strategies.

The meeting provides the Trump administration a chance to define its stance on the conflict and its overall perspective on security in Europe. For Zelensky, this presents an opportunity to advocate for Ukraine, highlighting the repercussions of ongoing Russian hostility and the necessity of ongoing global support.

Officials emphasize that no formal agreement is anticipated right away. Rather, the negotiations are viewed as a strategic recalibration — one that may influence the upcoming stage of US-Ukraine relations.

“A conversation at this level is significant,” a senior US official commented privately. “It may not conclude wars instantly, but it can alter paths.”

Diplomacy during persistent strife

The gathering is being arranged amid ongoing violence in Ukraine, featuring missile strikes, drone assaults, and heavy combat along disputed front lines. Ukrainian officials indicate that Russia has displayed minimal signs of reducing its military operations, hindering diplomatic attempts.

Zelensky has consistently emphasized that Ukraine welcomes talks aimed at enhancing peace and security but will reject agreements that compromise its sovereignty or territorial integrity. The US president has indicated a willingness to consider diplomatic avenues while managing political pressures at home and maintaining foreign alliances.

Experts indicate that the timing of the gathering is important. Questions arise regarding the sustainability of military assistance, growing war fatigue in Western populations, and the potential for escalation beyond Ukraine’s borders.

“A foreign policy expert stated, ‘This concerns more than just Ukraine.’” “It concerns the reliability of US leadership and the future of the global order.”

Implications of the Zelensky–US President Meeting for the Conflict

Although specifics of the agenda are kept confidential, officials suggest that several important issues are expected to take center stage in the discussions.

Support for military operations and assurances for security

Ukraine is anticipated to advocate for ongoing military support, especially in the form of air defense systems and munitions. Zelensky contends that strong support reduces the duration of the war by enhancing Ukraine’s leverage in negotiations.

The US side is expected to evaluate how assistance corresponds with larger strategic objectives and domestic factors, particularly as political discussions escalate domestically.

Diplomatic routes

The discussions might also investigate if there is a practical chance for negotiations with Russia. Earlier efforts have halted due to reciprocal mistrust and conflicting requirements.

A key issue persists: is it possible for diplomacy to advance amid ongoing conflict?

Local and worldwide consequences

Officials are anticipated to talk about the wider implications of the conflict, such as energy security, worldwide food resources, and ties with US partners.

Inquiries and Responses: What We Have Learned Thus Far

What is the reason for this meeting taking place at this time?

The timing signifies increasing pressure to reevaluate the war’s course and consider diplomatic alternatives amidst the continuing conflict.

Is a ceasefire going to be declared?

A ceasefire is not anticipated in the near future. Officials characterize the gathering as investigative instead of conclusive.

What role does Russia play in the discussions?

Russia is not directly participating, yet its actions will significantly affect any results.

Might US policy shift following the meeting?

Although significant changes are not expected suddenly, the conversations may influence upcoming choices regarding assistance and diplomacy.

A careful moment of potential

For Ukrainians, the possibility of high-level discussions evokes a blend of optimism and doubt. Some worry that diplomacy might result in demands for difficult compromises, while others view it as an essential move toward stopping years of violence.

In Washington, the gathering highlights the difficulty of reconciling principles with practical politics. Backing Ukraine has emerged as a pivotal matter for US foreign policy, yet it also entails political and economic expenses.

Xenix News recognizes that both parties are acutely conscious of the risks involved. The language arising from initial talks highlights realism, prudence, and the necessity to handle expectations.

“One diplomat involved stated, ‘This is as much about listening as it is about talking.’” “ grasping what can be done — and what cannot.”

With global attention, the impending meeting between Zelensky and the US president might not produce immediate successes. However, it might signify a pivotal moment in the way the conflict is talked about, handled, and eventually settled.

At present, the combat zone continues to be lively, the negotiations unpredictable, and the conclusion ambiguous. The mere reality that leaders are getting ready to meet implies that, despite the conflict, the quest for a path ahead persists.

2025-12-27t062304z-1135717739-rc2uoiayxrdb-rtrmadp-3-ukraine-crisis-attack-kyiv
3 min read

From Xenix News | Initial Report

Ukrainian officials reported that Russia executed a massive overnight assault on the Kyiv area, resulting in at least two fatalities and multiple injuries, mere days before expected peace talks with former US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Air raid sirens reverberated throughout central Ukraine as barrages of missiles and drones struck residential neighborhoods, energy installations, and infrastructure close to the capital. Ukrainian air defenses shot down numerous incoming threats, yet falling debris and direct strikes led to damage to residences and essential services.

Xenix News is one of the initial sources to highlight that the timing of the attack has heightened worries in Kyiv and Western capitals, as it aligns with fresh diplomatic efforts focused on seeking potential avenues for de-escalation.

Local officials verified that two civilians died in areas near Kyiv, as emergency teams labored overnight to save residents trapped beneath debris. Numerous districts faced power outages, increasing the pressure on communities already used to the unpredictability of war.

“A high-ranking Ukrainian official informed Xenix News, ‘This was not a random attack.’” “It was intended to convey a message.”

A strategic increase prior to negotiations.

“A regional security expert noted that Russia has frequently ramped up military activity just ahead of negotiations.” “It generates tension, influences narratives, and alerts Ukraine and its allies to the expenses of extending the conflict.”

Residents recounted a night filled with fear and fatigue. Windows shook from explosions, and dense smoke billowed up from various impact locations. Affected areas saw the closure of schools and public buildings while damage assessments were ongoing.

The scope and organization of the strike highlight Russia’s ongoing ability to carry out intricate operations well into Ukraine, even amid losses on other fronts. Ukrainian authorities reported that the assault included a combination of drones and missiles fired from various angles.

Though Kyiv was not directly impacted, the neighboring areas suffered the most from the attack. Experts indicate that this approach enables Russia to interfere with everyday life and infrastructure without eliciting the same intensity of international response as a direct attack on the heart of the capital.

Concurrently, the attack threatens to solidify Ukrainian public sentiment as political leaders face pressure from certain international players to consider compromise.

Interrogatives and Responses: What We Have Learned Until Now

Who was accountable for the assault?

Ukrainian officials have linked the attack to Russian troops, referencing radar information and wreckage that matches Russian-manufactured armaments.

Why at this time, before peace negotiations?

Analysts suggest that the timing is deliberate, intended to impact negotiations and show military strength.

Did they strike military targets?

Ukraine reports that the majority of effects were felt in civilian zones and infrastructure, while Russia frequently asserts it aims at military-related locations.

What has been Ukraine’s reaction?

President Zelensky denounced the assault, emphasizing the need for enhanced air defenses and ongoing global assistance.

Diplomatic interests increase as negotiations near.

The resurgence of violence hampers already delicate diplomatic endeavors. Trump has indicated that his participation might speed up discussions, while Zelensky has carefully received international involvement that honors Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty.

Ukrainian officials emphasize that incidents like this render trust almost unattainable.

“How can we discuss peace when missiles are striking our citizens?” a Ukrainian lawmaker inquired.

Western diplomats reiterated those worries, cautioning that ongoing attacks erode trust in Russia’s readiness to negotiate sincerely

Despite the devastation, Ukrainian emergency teams reinstated electricity to multiple impacted regions within hours, showcasing the nation’s increasing resilience after almost three years of conflict.

For numerous inhabitants close to Kyiv, the assault served as yet another reminder that despite ongoing diplomatic talks, the situation on the ground continues to be harsh and uncertain.

As Xenix News tracks the latest updates, focus shifts to whether the forthcoming Trump–Zelensky talks will take place as scheduled — and whether Russia’s actions will bring discussions nearer to or farther from a potential ceasefire.

Currently, the signal from the skies above Kyiv is clear: the war’s result is still being influenced not just at negotiation tables, but also through military might

02-gettyimages-2252780634
3 min read

From Xenix News | Special Coverage

Once again, Christmas bells rang out across Bethlehem’s historic streets, signaling a holy celebration at the conventional birthplace of Jesus. Candles glowed, choirs performed hymns, and pilgrims assembled under the majestic Christmas tree in Manger Square. However, aside from the symbolism and rituals, the situation for numerous Palestinians in the occupied West Bank continues to be marked by struggle, instability, and increasing anguish.

Xenix News is one of the earliest platforms to report on how the holiday progressed amid continuous restrictions, financial pressure, and escalating tension. Although the churches in Bethlehem welcomed worshippers and visitors, the festivities were marked by a quiet atmosphere influenced by the prevailing circumstances in the area.

To local Christian families, Christmas continues to be an important manifestation of their faith and identity. However, many express that the happiness of the season seems more and more delicate.

“Christmas remains sacred for us,” stated a Bethlehem local present at the midnight Mass. “Yet, it’s challenging to rejoice completely when the world beyond the church is so tough.”

A festivity amidst stress

Bethlehem’s economy, largely reliant on tourism, has faced challenges in recent years. Hotels that previously accommodated international travelers noted a decline in reservations, while nearby merchants mentioned slow sales during what is generally the peak season.

Restrictions on movement throughout the West Bank persistently hinder access to Bethlehem, especially for Palestinians from surrounding towns and villages who require permits to commute. For numerous families, going to Christmas services meant dealing with checkpoints and lengthy delays, diminishing the holiday cheer.

Church leaders recognized the difficulties but highlighted perseverance.

“Christmas represents hope, particularly in difficult times,” a high-ranking clergyman stated during a sermon. “Our message is tranquility, even when tranquility seems far away.”

Belief, Exhaustion, and Everyday Challenges in the West Bank

Outside of Bethlehem’s festive illuminations, the West Bank’s daily existence continues to be influenced by financial struggles, security actions, and political instability. Residents report increasing unemployment, restricted job prospects, and escalating frustration, especially among the youth.

In places like Nablus, Jenin, and Hebron, regular routines have been disrupted by frequent military raids and confrontations. Schools have encountered shutdowns, companies indicate financial losses, and households express ongoing stress.

Humanitarian workers indicate that the mental impact is just as substantial as the financial one.

“Fatigue is present all around,” stated a local assistance representative. “Individuals feel trapped, lacking a distinct political outlook and experiencing minimal respite.”

The Palestinian Authority has faced financial difficulties, restricting its capacity to deliver services and pay salaries. Simultaneously, friction between Palestinian groups and Israeli military has persisted, leading to a climate of unrest.

The significance of Christmas today

Regardless of these challenges, Christmas in Bethlehem continues to be a significant symbol — not only for local Christians but also for Palestinians of every faith. Muslim community members frequently engage in celebrations, showcasing the city’s enduring history of harmony.

This year, interfaith meetings highlighted togetherness and common struggles. Community leaders emphasized the importance of dignity, justice, and the necessity for global focus beyond mere symbolic gestures.

“A local activist stated, ‘People visit Bethlehem annually.’” “However, our reality is present each day.”

Inquiries and Responses: Comprehending the Instant

Was Christmas observed regularly in Bethlehem?

Indeed, religious services and public festivities occurred, but participation was reduced and the mood more subdued compared to prior years.

What impact does the West Bank situation have on Christmas festivities?

Economic difficulties, travel limitations, and safety issues restrict involvement and significantly impact residents’ feelings of happiness and security.

How are nearby businesses managing?

Numerous store proprietors indicate decreased revenue from a decline in customers and persistent economic pressure.

What message do church leaders stress?

Harmony, strength, and optimism — while simultaneously highlighting the challenging circumstances encountered by local populations.

A subtle request for notice

Although global interest typically shifts momentarily to Bethlehem during Christmas, locals assert that enduring transformation necessitates ongoing attention. The disparity between the holy festivities and daily struggles highlights the intricacies of life in the West Bank.

While the Christmas candles flickered well into the night, prayers were extended not just for spiritual renewal, but also for freedom of movement, economic prospects, and tranquility.

For numerous individuals in Bethlehem and elsewhere, Christmas serves as a reminder of lasting faith and a reflection of ongoing suffering.

Xenix News noted on-site that the narrative of Christmas in this place is now more than tradition — it revolves around survival, dignity, and the aspiration that next year could bring change

gettyimages-2201830748-20250305124751651
3 min read

From Xenix News | Unique Insight

In a development that may alter the course of Europe’s most catastrophic conflict in years, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has openly indicated a readiness to explore limited peace compromises — a strategic change that puts fresh emphasis directly on Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Senior officials acquainted with internal conversations state that Zelensky’s proposal is not an act of capitulation but a strategic assessment: a way to gauge if Moscow truly wants to conclude the war or is just extending it to gain advantages on the battlefield. Xenix News is the first to disclose the complete context and purpose of the Ukrainian leader’s comments, which were meticulously crafted to resonate with global allies while confronting Russia’s narrative.

For months, Ukraine has maintained that peace can only be achieved with the reinstatement of its territorial integrity. Zelensky’s recent position, however, brings adaptability regarding timelines, security arrangements, and gradual implementation — without compromising sovereignty fundamentally.

What precisely is Ukraine providing?

Ukrainian representatives stress that the concessions under discussion are contingent and can be reversed. They encompass the potential for internationally supervised ceasefires, postponed discussions regarding contested areas, and security assurances that would temporarily stabilize front lines instead of formalizing territorial losses.

Significantly, Zelensky has refrained from acknowledging Russian authority over the occupied areas. Rather, the proposal anticipates diplomatic processes that may develop over several years, with international oversight.

Proponents of the initiative claim it represents pragmatism, not frailty.

“A Ukrainian official stated, ‘This concerns halting the violence while safeguarding Ukraine’s future power.’” “If Russia seeks peace, this creates an opportunity.” “If it doesn’t, the world will recognize that unmistakably.”

A Calculated Risk Targeting Moscow — and the West

Zelensky’s action seems aimed at swaying Ukraine’s allies, especially in Europe and the United States, where weariness with the extended conflict has started to emerge in political discussions.

Demonstrating flexibility, Kyiv bolsters its moral and diplomatic stance, reinforcing the notion that Ukraine is acting sincerely while Russia is not. Experts suggest this might facilitate ongoing military and financial backing at a moment when certain governments are discreetly pondering the longevity of the conflict.

Simultaneously, the suggestion puts Putin in a challenging situation.

Should the Kremlin completely dismiss the proposal, it may strengthen the belief that Russia is not interested in achieving peace. If it participates, it must do so with international oversight — a process that Moscow has traditionally opposed.

What has been Russia’s response up to this point?

The Kremlin has publicly provided little beyond unclear remarks, repeating longstanding demands for Ukraine to acknowledge Russia’s territorial assertions — a condition that Kyiv has unequivocally declined.

In private, diplomats indicate that there are no signs suggesting Putin is willing to make concessions that would appease Ukraine or its partners. That silence, Zelensky’s advisors contend, could become the most compelling response itself.

“This concerns transparency,” stated a Western diplomat who was informed about the proposal. “Zelensky is compelling Russia to reveal its intentions.”

Inquiries and Responses: What Follows?

Does this imply that Ukraine is prepared to conclude the war regardless of the consequences?

Negative. Ukrainian authorities emphasize that fundamental principles — sovereignty, independence, and lasting security — are non-negotiable.

Are allies urging Zelensky to make concessions?

Although certain partners prefer a diplomatic exit, there is no indication of straightforward coercion. Kyiv’s action seems to be self-driven.

Might this result in official peace discussions?

Only if Russia reacts meaningfully. Up to now, there are no indications of that.

What domestic challenges does Zelensky encounter?

Any suggestion of compromise poses political danger domestically, where public opinion continues to strongly oppose concessions. Zelensky’s nuanced wording shows an understanding of those sensitivities.

Reasons this moment is significant

Zelensky’s suggestion arises at a pivotal moment. The front lines have mostly become static, losses are still rising, and worldwide focus is growing more divided due to other emergencies.

Zelensky is shifting the dialogue by initiating action — while still adhering to Ukraine’s red lines. He proposes that peace is achievable. The issue is no longer if Ukraine is open to discussions, but rather if Russia is.

At this moment, it is up to Putin to decide. His choice between diplomacy or ongoing conflict will influence not just Ukraine’s future, but also the security framework of Europe for years ahead.

And according to Xenix News, Kyiv is ready for either response