American Eagle and American Airlines aircraft are parked at gates at LaGuardia Airport located in the Queens area of New York, on Sunday. Adam Gray/AP
David Seymour, American Airlines’ operations chief, informed airline employees that the shutdown’s effects were “simply unacceptable,” following the most challenging weekend for air traffic controller staffing shortages, which led to nearly 1,400 cancellations across the carrier’s mainline and regional operations.
“This is utterly unacceptable, and all individuals deserve more,” Seymour stated.
He stated that American’s primary and regional services experienced 57,000 delay minutes due to air traffic control, affecting nearly 250,000 passengers.
He reaffirmed his commitment to safety, emphasizing that the airline will persist in adhering to the guideline issued by the Federal Aviation Administration last week, which gradually reduces capacity at 40 US airports by up to 10% this week. He informed employees that the airline anticipates “ongoing cancellations and delays alongside the reductions mandated by the FAA.”
“As House Democrats, we recognize we are aligned with the American people in this struggle, and we refuse to back a partisan Republican spending bill that undermines the health care of Americans. We will persist in our efforts to extend the tax credits for the Affordable Care Act,” he stated during a press conference at the Capitol.
Jeffries supported his Senate counterpart, Minority Leader Schumer, who rejected the agreement but continues to encounter criticism inside the party.
When asked on Monday if he thought Schumer was doing a good job and if he should retain his position, Jeffries replied, “Yes and yes.”
Agadez, Niger / XenixNews International Desk — Under the expansive golden sands of the Sahara Desert, a harsh and quiet economy is flourishing. Individuals escaping conflict, economic hardship, or oppression are being seized and kept captive by smugglers who have transformed into traffickers — individuals who have discovered ways to exploit suffering for profit.
For families in Sudan, Eritrea, and Ethiopia, the calls arrive unexpectedly. A frantic voice — at times a brother, at times a sibling — begs from a temporary camp deep within the desert: “Kindly send money.” “They’ll end my life if you don’t.”
These crimes are not isolated incidents; they are components of an expanding network of ransom-driven extortion that has transformed one of the globe’s most perilous migration paths into a series of contemporary abductions, tracked via satellite phones and compensated through cash transfers from relatives located thousands of miles away.
XenixNews has revealed through discussions with aid workers, survivors, and local authorities that traffickers operate from Libya to Niger and from Chad to Sudan — an extensive desert underworld where pain is exchanged for profit.
🌍 A Wasteland of Despair: The Kidnapping Business in the Sahara
The city of Agadez, formerly a prominent Saharan trading center, has transformed into a passageway for spirits — the final significant halt before migrants undertake the perilous trek toward Libya and the Mediterranean Sea.
A path that was previously led by smugglers providing transportation has evolved into a maze of imprisonment, where armed groups capture migrants, inflict torture, and compel them to contact their families for ransom, which can amount to $5,000 per individual.
Humanitarian groups operating in the area report a concerning development: traffickers now earn more from ransom than from transport.
For numerous households, that payment never shows up. Refugees unable to pay are left in the desert or trafficked to different groups in a cycle of exploitation that spans several borders.
🔍Question:& Answer: Grasping the Ransom Economy of the Sahara
Question: In what ways do traffickers seize and dominate refugees?
Answer: The procedure frequently starts with trickery. Refugees pay human traffickers for passage to Libya, aiming to get to Europe. However, once in the desert, the convoy could be intercepted or rerouted. Armed individuals seize control, take phones, and compel captives to contact family under the threat of harm.
Question: Why are governments unable to prevent this?
Answer: The Sahara is extensive, unregulated, and lightly supervised. Regional governments — often facing poverty or instability — lack the means and cooperation to monitor the desert’s vast millions of square kilometers.
In certain instances, corrupt officials benefit by ignoring the issue or receiving a portion of the ransom funds.
Question: Who are the victims?
Answer: The majority are young men and women from Sudan, Eritrea, Chad, and Nigeria, although the routes also draw migrants from West Africa seeking to traverse the Mediterranean. Numerous individuals are escaping political oppression or violent conflict; others are merely searching for employment.
Yet all confront the same dire consequence if apprehended. Survivors recount being confined in improvised desert jails — pits in the earth covered with metal plates, or earthen structures encircled by barbed wire.
💰 The Human Toll of an Expanding Criminal Operation
Aid workers believe that each year, hundreds of migrants perish in the Sahara — not just from thirst or exposure, but also due to abuse and killings linked to ransom.
“Human smuggling has evolved beyond that,” stated Dr. Lina Toumi, a human rights researcher who spoke to XenixNews. “It’s a sector founded on suffering — one that flourishes while the world remains oblivious.”
In isolated desert areas, supervision is minimal. Refugees vanish for weeks or months before their families find out what occurred. At times, the ransom is paid, yet the prisoners are not freed.
Satellite imagery from humanitarian organizations indicates a rise in unregistered camps and heat signatures in established smuggling routes, implying growth in these activities.
🕊️ The Issue of Accountability: Who Holds the Power to Stop This?
Question: What actions are international organizations taking?
The European Union has financed border patrols and migration prevention initiatives, yet critics claim these actions merely redirect migrants to riskier paths, indirectly supporting the trafficking industry.
“Each wall erected in Europe leads another refugee into the grasp of traffickers,” Dr. Toumi stated to XenixNews. “The answer isn’t to prevent migration — it’s to ensure it is safe and lawful.”
Question: How are families managing?
Answer: Numerous individuals incur debt or liquidate assets to satisfy ransoms. Some never regain their financial stability. Some exist in quiet, tormented by calls that go unanswered.
“We sold our house to help my brother,” said Samira, a refugee residing in Cairo. “Once the payment was made, the traffickers disappeared.” We never received any word from him after that.
For the families who stand by their phones, every ring brings both fear and hope. For those who continue to traverse the desert, the silence of the world poses the greatest threat.
New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani arrives for a a news conference alongside members of his mayoral transition team in New York City on November 5. Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images
New York / XenixNews Political Desk — History often reveals itself in surprising locations. This week, New York City experienced one of those occasions when Zohran Mamdani, a forward-thinking Democrat and the city’s inaugural Muslim mayor, gave a victory address that resonated throughout every borough — and every neighborhood.
However, the response to Mamdani’s victory was far from consistent among Jewish New Yorkers. In areas from Brooklyn’s Borough Park to Manhattan’s Upper West Side, responses varied from “mazel tov” and hopeful optimism to subdued worry and doubt.
Mamdani’s ascent — transitioning from a community organizer and state assemblyman to the most influential position in America’s largest city — has been portrayed as a victory for diversity and generational transformation. However, it simultaneously prompts intricate inquiries regarding identity, politics, and representation in a city historically recognized for its diverse faiths.
For many, his win signifies a significant step towards inclusivity. For some, it ignites profound discussions about the intersection of progressive politics and enduring cultural and religious sentiments.
A Split Commemoration: Optimism, Uncertainty, and Genuine Inquiries
On election night, with confetti swirling in the air in Queens, Mamdani proclaimed, “This city belongs to each of us.” His message struck a chord with young voters, immigrants, and activists who fought for housing justice, affordable transportation, and racial equality.
However, in Jewish communities — which represent one of New York’s largest and most politically engaged groups — responses were more nuanced.
Many, especially younger Jewish New Yorkers, viewed Mamdani’s win as an indication that the city’s political landscape is changing. “He embodies a fresh wave of leadership,” stated Leora Katz, a Jewish student activist at NYU. “We might have differing views on foreign policy or cultural matters, but we are united in our struggle for justice locally.”
The responses reflect the conflicts between symbolic advancement and political instability — feelings that characterize this period in New York’s intricate social environment.
Question: What makes Mamdani’s election considered significant?
Answer: Zohran Mamdani’s win is groundbreaking on several levels. He is New York City’s inaugural Muslim mayor, the child of Ugandan and Indian immigrants, and an outspoken progressive who centered his campaign on housing rights, economic equity, and resistance to discrimination.
His victory also signifies the widest generational change in urban politics in more than twenty years. Bolstered by substantial backing from younger voters, labor unions, and minority populations, Mamdani’s ascent indicates that the political center of the city has shifted to the left — favoring multicultural representation.
Question: What causes discomfort among certain Jewish New Yorkers?
Answer: The discomfort relates not to Mamdani’s beliefs but to political viewpoints and foreign policy connections. Mamdani has been vocal on matters concerning the Middle East and human rights, viewpoints that have sometimes attracted criticism from parts of the Jewish community.
Some view his activism as principled, while others consider it provocative. In Borough Park, community figure Miriam Rosen conveyed to XenixNews, “We honor his accomplishment — however, trust needs to be established. Statements about unity need to transform into actions that embrace all individuals, particularly during times of heightened global tensions.
Many recognize that Mamdani has made an effort to visit synagogues, participate in interfaith events, and foster connections throughout his campaign. “Rabbi Jonah Levin from the Bronx stated, ‘He has demonstrated greater openness than many anticipated.'” “Should he keep listening, the city will gain.”
Question: How does this impact interfaith relations in New York?
Answer: Religious leaders assert that Mamdani’s victory might create opportunities for fresh discussions regarding collaboration, acceptance, and common goals. New York has historically been a crossroads where religion and politics meet, occasionally with tension.
Mamdani’s challenge — and opportunity — lies in building trust among communities that have traditionally been at odds over delicate global or cultural matters. “He’s entering a role where symbolism is significant,” remarked Dr. Ruth Goldman, a sociologist at Columbia University. “His success will hinge on his ability to translate his messages of inclusivity into daily governance.”
Question: Are Jewish voters shifting away from progressive politics?
Answer: Not completely. Jewish New Yorkers continue to exhibit political diversity. Younger, urban Jewish voters frequently support progressive issues like economic fairness and climate justice. Long-established or more conventional neighborhoods, especially in Brooklyn, often emphasize issues related to public safety, education, and city financing.
What’s different is the heightened discussion occurring within Jewish homes — where the significance of progressivism is being reassessed. For certain individuals, Mamdani’s win strengthens their faith in pluralism and collaborative effort. For some, it raises inquiries about whether progressive movements continue to include their perspectives.
The Path Forward: Is Mamdani Capable of Uniting a Fragmented City?
The path forward for Mayor Mamdani will be challenging. His success will depend on harmonizing progressive reform with comfort for those who feel apprehensive about his perspective.
For Jewish New Yorkers, his initial actions will hold significant importance — whether he participates in cultural events, backs community safety initiatives, or pays symbolic visits to neighborhoods that seem neglected.
Political analysts suggest that, if managed effectively, Mamdani’s leadership might reshape “unity in diversity” — not merely as a catchphrase, but as an actual experience. His theme of “a city for everyone” will be evaluated through his approach to funding education, tackling hate crimes, and handling tensions when global events resonate locally.
Perspectives from the Sidewalk: Inquiries and Aspirations
Question: What do typical New Yorkers anticipate from him?
Answer: Numerous individuals are observing with careful optimism. “Should he ensure rent is reasonable and maintain the safety of our city, differences in beliefs won’t be relevant,” mentioned Moishe Adler, a deli proprietor from the Upper East Side.
Some express concerns regarding polarization. “The city seems split — politically, culturally, and even emotionally,” stated Rachel Bernstein, a teacher from Queens. “I desire for him to guide with compassion.” “That is what will lead to healing.”
A Fresh Era for New York
In a city with over eight million inhabitants and more than600,000 Jewish citizens, Mamdani’s election signifies not only a shift in governance but also a challenge for coexistence.
An older Jewish voter in Brooklyn remarked, “I exclaimed mazel tov when he was victorious.” But now, I want to find out if he will honor his commitments. “That’s the true challenge of a leader.”
For XenixNews, this sentiment best reflects the city’s atmosphere — a blend of optimism, heritage, and cautious skepticism — the core of democracy in action.
Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., walks with her father Former Vice President Dick Cheney on the one year anniversary of the January 6th Capitol insurrection on Capitol Hill on January 6, 2022 in Washington, DC. Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images
Washington / Political Desk — In a time when allegiance to political factions frequently takes precedence over commitment to truth, a certain Republican family opted for an alternative route. The narrative of ex-Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter Liz Cheney has emerged as a crucial episode in the conflict between integrity and authority — a reminder that certain principles transcend political boundaries.
This is not merely a narrative of familial togetherness; it’s a tale of bravery arising from heritage. Liz Cheney’s resistance to former President Donald Trump transformed her career and reputation, while her father’s unwavering support provided her the courage to confront the turmoil. Together, they represented a message that has become uncommon in contemporary American politics: the nation should take precedence over the party.
When Liz Cheney openly dismissed Trump’s untrue election assertions and chose to impeach him following the January 6th Capitol incident, she was aware the repercussions would be significant. Her choice led to the loss of her party leadership and subsequently her congressional position. Still, she remained resolute — influenced by a father who devoted his life to the very institutions she aimed to safeguard.
Dick Cheney’s subtle yet steadfast influence reminded his daughter that real patriotism involves upholding the Constitution, even when it means standing apart from your own supporters. His legacy as a steadfast Republican provided her support, while his insight offered her bravery.
When Heritage Encounters Opposition: A Father’s Impact on Liz Cheney’s Rebellion
Prior to Liz Cheney’s public clash with Trump, few envisioned such a rift emerging within one of the most devoted Republican families in contemporary history. Dick Cheney — previously recognized as the resolute vice president during the Bush administration — had consistently represented conservative power, national security, and party cohesion. However, as the political environment moved toward populism, the older Cheney saw something more perilous than division: the weakening of democratic values.
As Liz Cheney started to criticize Trump’s actions, she was aware of the personal and political consequences. Her father was beside her, encouraging her to stand firm. In private discussions, Dick Cheney frequently told her that history would honor those who stood up for the truth during its most perilous times.
Their collaboration emerged as a symbol of subtle resistance — a link connecting conventional conservatism and ethical awareness. Liz’s involvement in the January 6th investigation committee, her open support of democratic institutions, and her ongoing denouncement of political extremism reflected her strong beliefs and her father’s legacy.
As the Republican Party became more aligned with Trump, Liz Cheney’s defiance turned her into a target of resentment among her colleagues. However, she kept reiterating the same concept her father had instilled in her from a young age: serving the public entails safeguarding the system, rather than the person in power.
Dick Cheney remained vocal. He featured in campaign videos and statements to uphold his daughter’s integrity, labeling Trump as a danger to the Republic. His intervention was unprecedented — a former vice president publicly criticizing a person still beloved by many in his own party. However, in his view, remaining silent would have betrayed the Constitution he once pledged to protect.
For Liz Cheney, the price was immediate. She was removed from her leadership position in the House Republican Conference and ultimately lost in her Wyoming primary. However, her position elevated her beyond that of a politician — she turned into an emblem of bravery and responsibility.
As others succumbed to party influence, Liz remained steadfast, upholding her father’s belief that allegiance to America’s institutions outweighed loyalty to any individual leader. This common conviction brought together father and daughter, connecting years of political knowledge.
Their joint defiance served as a reminder to the nation that ideals come with a cost — and that at times, the price of remaining steadfast is solitude. However, as Dick Cheney privately remarked to colleagues, “There are times when sacrificing your position is worthwhile to preserve your honor.”
Tradition Over Faithfulness
When Liz Cheney departed from her position, her ethical impact had surpassed her governmental role. She discussed revitalizing a Republican Party founded on honesty, legality, and constitutional responsibility. Her father, despite belonging to an older generation, endorsed this vision—recognizing in her actions a continuation of the principles that had previously characterized American conservatism: strength, integrity, and dedication to democratic order.
Both Cheneys were aware that their position would attract criticism. However, they recognized that political history frequently evaluates courage more favorably than practicality. Since then, their message — nation above party — has persisted in discussions concerning leadership, honesty, and national cohesion.
Their tale is one of dedication and perseverance — of a daughter who drew power from her father’s heritage, and of a father who discovered salvation in his daughter’s bravery. They confronted not only Donald Trump’s control over their party but also the notion that discretion is preferable to standing by one’s principles.
Liz Cheney’s determination has motivated individuals from various political backgrounds. It demonstrated that moral clarity can endure political defeat and that legacy can eclipse power. For Dick Cheney, previously one of the most divisive figures in American politics, it presented a chance for redemption — demonstrating that even the masterminds of hard power can prioritize conscience over compliance.
Ultimately, the Cheneys’ position is not focused on securing election victories. It’s about maintaining the belief that truth, law, and nation should always take precedence — even if it requires standing solitary
Washington / Border Watch — With discussions regarding the southern border wall heating up again, a new XenixNews analysis investigates an important issue: If the wall from the Trump era starts to deteriorate, where will the initial weaknesses be found?
Once a prominent emblem of strength and safety, the enormous edifice that spans the border now encounters its greatest challenge — the collective effects of nature, disrepair, and political issues. According to experts and local sources, the initial indicators of issues could already be appearing in the most isolated and legally complicated areas.
The concept of the “Trump Wall” has consistently represented more than just steel and cement. It symbolizes a political commitment — one that characterized a presidency and divided a country. However, similar to many ambitious undertakings, its longevity relies less on its construction and more on its upkeep.
As new administrations change their focus and funding, the state of the wall reveals a deeper narrative: the clash between ideology and reality, between symbolism and actual impact. According to experts, if it is on the verge of collapsing, the initial cracks will be slight — concealed beneath sand, corrosion, or red tape.
Fractures Below the Surface: Areas Where Vulnerability Will Appear First
The most delicate parts of the wall are situated over rugged desert and mountainous areas. In these regions, severe temperatures, sudden floods, and changing soil continuously challenge the wall’s strength. Metal slats deteriorate in the desert heat, foundations shift during monsoon rains, and extensive stretches of isolated fencing may go months without examination.
Further east, in the river valley area, another danger arises. The river’s natural flow keeps altering, eroding the soil near fence posts and distorting the landscape. Legal conflicts regarding land ownership hinder access for repairs, causing delays that escalate minor erosion into significant damage.
Specialists observe that these two areas — the arid mountains and the river basin — might uncover the initial indications of the wall’s deterioration. Where neglect and nature intersect, infrastructure silently deteriorates.
In regions where the wall traverses private property, an additional difficulty emerges. Property owners have historically contended with the government regarding ownership and access rights. Active lawsuits can prevent maintenance crews from accessing specific areas entirely. Eventually, minor unaddressed areas develop into vulnerabilities — both in structure and meaning.
Financial strains contribute to the problem. As maintenance budgets decrease, focus shifts to more crowded crossings and urban areas, while isolated sections remain neglected. These isolated areas, overlooked and given low importance, are where deterioration begins to take hold.
Environmental regulations have also prompted temporary suspensions in construction or repair work. In safeguarded wildlife regions or heritage locations, limitations hinder teams from operating without constraints. One postponed repair in these areas can create voids for months, leading to both physical and political weaknesses.
The weather keeps challenging the durability of the wall. Storms can erode foundations or clog drainage channels with rubble. When those channels are full, stagnant water corrodes the steel and compromises joints. Eventually, the wall starts to lean or bow in areas that were never intended to bear such stress
Technological components — cameras, motion detectors, and floodlights — frequently malfunction first when financial support or upkeep diminishes. Dim areas and malfunctioning sensors transform the wall from an observed boundary into an unchanging monument. The steel may still be there, but its function starts to diminish well before the structure itself fails.
⚙️ An Emblem in Distress
The wall was created as a clear representation of dominance and authority. However, in certain regions, it currently signifies the contrary — an evident symbol of government exhaustion. When cameras cease functioning, when gates corrode and close, and when foundations shift without maintenance, it indicates a system losing control over its own representation.
In specific ecologically sensitive regions, maintenance has completely ceased because of ecological and tribal resistance. Neglected fences merge into the surroundings as sand, wind, and plants take over the metal structures. These areas, more than others, illustrate how the wall’s “decay” might be more of a symbol than an actual deterioration — a subtle diminishing instead of a dramatic fall.
The initial external indications might be slight: one leaning part following intense rainfall, a gate ajar due to rusted hinges, a tower camera remaining damaged for an extended period. Patrol officers may observe before the general public becomes aware. However, each minor setback undermines the sense of permanence that previously characterized the project.
When local residents or border agents post pictures of destruction online, these images acquire political significance. One corroded panel or bleached segment can ignite a nationwide discussion — not due to the destruction per se, but due to its implications: declining authority, altering priorities, and the gradual decay of a political commitment.
Ultimately, the issue is not if the wall will collapse, but how silently it will diminish. As per experts from XenixNews, initial signs will not be found in flashy news stories but rather in neglected areas — the barren deserts, the soggy valleys, and the extensive, silent stretches where policy encounters reality.
Confidential Information Uncovered: Xenix News Exposes the Reality Behind Trump’s Audacious Action
Ex-U.S. President Donald Trump has once more captured international attention — this time by declaring the end of all trade talks with Canada. Trump stated that the decision arises from what he termed an “offensive and manipulative” anti-tariff ad created in Ontario, Canada. The advertisement, referencing Ronald Reagan’s criticism of tariffs, seems to have resonated within Trump’s circle and revived past disputes between the two neighboring countries.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump announced that “due to their outrageous conduct, all trade discussions with Canada are now canceled.” He charged the Canadian provincial government with trying to meddle in American judicial and political affairs, denouncing the ad as “a shameful act of propaganda aimed at swaying public opinion in the United States.”
Xenix News, which initially revealed the complete background of this issue, reported that the advertisement was broadcast in various U.S. border states and emphasized the negative impact of tariffs on both consumers and manufacturers. The message, delivered through excerpts from Ronald Reagan’s famous speeches, aimed to encourage free trade and collaboration — yet to Trump, it felt like an offense shrouded in sentimentality.
What Caused the Aftermath
The trade office of the Ontario government allegedly funded the advertisement to promote understanding of the economic effects of tariffs on industries that operate across borders. Utilizing Ronald Reagan’s voice alongside vintage footage, the advertisement quietly suggested that America’s protectionist trade policy could harm long-term relationships.
Trump, on the other hand, perceived it in another way. He contended that the advertisement was a blatant assault on his administration’s policies, labeling it as “foreign interference” in American matters. His team proposed that the Canadian side intentionally sought to sway American voters before possible trade renegotiations.
Sources familiar with the situation informed Xenix Newsthat Trump was made aware of the ad days prior to its viral online spread, and he responded with “angry disbelief” after viewing it. The advertisement allegedly reached millions of viewers in the U.S., especially in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania — all crucial industrial states with significant trade connections to Canada.
The Reagan Presidential Foundation voiced worry as well, indicating that they had not permitted the use of Reagan’s voice or image. They referred to the editing as “selective” and possibly deceptive, claiming that Reagan’s legacy was being taken out of context to critique current U.S. policies.
Economic and Diplomatic Consequences
The abrupt stop of trade talks may lead to significant economic repercussions. Canada continues to be one of the largest trading partners of the United States, exchanging hundreds of billions in goods and services each year. Halting or terminating these discussions threatens to generate uncertainty in various industries, such as steel, aluminum, agriculture, and automotive.
Economists caution that countermeasures may soon occur. Should Canada impose new tariffs or trade restrictions, U.S. companies could encounter increased expenses and interrupted supply chains. At the same time, investors are monitoring the situation carefully, since markets typically respond unfavorably to unexpected political or diplomatic changes.
Diplomatic specialists indicate that this action may complicate future negotiations regarding the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), which succeeded NAFTA and is scheduled for evaluation in the upcoming years. Should relations further deteriorate, it may lead to increased economic tensions across North America.
The Political Perspective
Trump’s choice might also fulfill a domestic political objective. Analysts think he is leveraging the situation to strengthen his reputation as a protector of U.S. industries and a tough negotiator on trade. By openly “punishing” Canada, Trump demonstrates power to his backers while reinforcing his America First message — an essential aspect of his political persona.
Canadian authorities have been careful in their responses thus far. A representative for the Ontario government stated that the advertisement aimed to “promote dialogue” on trade equity, rather than to offend or meddle in another country’s political affairs. The office of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has yet to release a direct statement but is said to be assessing the diplomatic consequences.
Within Washington, responses have been mixed. Certain Republican leaders have backed Trump’s position, contending that foreign nations ought to refrain from engaging in U.S. political discussions. Conversely, Democrats have criticized Trump for excessively reacting and endangering vital trade relationships over what they describe as “a straightforward public statement.”
The Concealed Narrative — Uncovered by Xenix News
cnn was the first to reveal that the anti-tariff advertising campaign had been arranged months in advance, well before any explicit references to Trump or U.S. legal issues surfaced in the news. Internal documents acquired by Xenix journalists reveal that the Ontario Trade Department planned to prioritize “shared economic resilience” rather than political statements. Yet, after Trump openly criticized the campaign, it gained momentum, evolving into a significant diplomatic crisis
Xenix News has reached out to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s office for comment, as well as the office of Dominic LeBlanc, the minister overseeing US-Canada trade.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford had first posted the ad online on October 16, writing in a caption: “Using every tool we have, we’ll never stop making the case against American tariffs on Canada. The way to prosperity is by working together.”
A disclaimer under the ad states that it was not approved or sponsored by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library or the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.
Canada has long been one of the US’ top trading partners; last year, the US imported $411.9 billion worth of goods from Canada, according to government figures.
But Canada’s economy has been hit hard by Trump’s steep sectoral tariffs on autos, steel, aluminum, lumber, and energy – some of the country’s key exports to the US. Those fall under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump brokered during his first term and will be under mandatory review next year. Canada’s unemployment rate is now at its highest point in nine years.
“This is the last thing that either country needs,” Jack Buffington, director of the supply chain program at the University of Denver, told CNN after Trump’s announcement. “We need to stabilize the North American supply chain, particularly given the challenges that the US has with China.”
Carney won an election in April with a strident message for Canadians, warning that their relationship with America would change dramatically in the coming years. He has fostered relationships with other Western countries instead; on Thursday, before Trump’s post, he had announced on X that Canada plans to double its non-US exports in the next decade.
“Our core mission is to build a stronger economy — one that doesn’t rely on a single trade partner,” he wrote on X.
Trade tensions had eased slightly in recent months, however, with Carney meeting Trump at the Oval Office earlier this month. There, Trump joked about a “merger” of the two countries but also praised his counterpart as a “world-class leader.”
LeBlanc, the Canadian trade minister, said negotiators for both countries had left with directions to “quickly land deals” on steel, aluminum and energy. He described the meeting between leaders as “successful, positive, substantial.”
That brief warming of ties, it seems, is over – at least for now.
