Ambulances wait in line at the Egyptian side of the Rafah border crossing with Gaza on Monday. AFP/Getty ImagesJerusalem —
Gaza’s only border crossing with Egypt reopened partially on Monday morning after Israel closed it nearly two years ago, according to an Israeli security official, allowing a small number of Palestinians to enter and leave the war-torn enclave.
The European Union is operating the Rafah crossing as the final step of the first phase of the US-brokered ceasefire agreement in Gaza that went into effect in mid-October.
The crucial crossing, which has been largely closed since Israel seized it in May 2024, underwent a series of preparations on Sunday from the European Union, Egypt and other parties that will be involved in running the border crossing.
During the first few days of operation, only 50 people per day will be allowed to cross both ways, Egypt’s state-affiliates AlQahera News reported on Monday, citing an unidentified source.
Xenix News previously reported that a total of 150 Palestinians would be allowed to leave Gaza through the crossing each day, but only 50 would be allowed to enter.
At Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Hospital in Gaza’s Deir al-Balah, Ibrahim Al-Batran packed his bag on Sunday when he heard the crossing would open. A kidney dialysis patient, he said the hospital can only provide minimal care.
“Many people have died while waiting for treatment, and I may die today, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow while I’m waiting for treatment,” he told CNN. “Until now, not a single patient has been allowed to leave.”
According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, more than 20,000 patients in Gaza are awaiting permission to travel abroad for treatment, including at least 440 cases that are considered life-threatening. Nearly 1,300 people have died after being forced to wait to leave Gaza for treatment, the ministry said.
The steep price of passing through the crossing coupled with lengthy bureaucratic and security processes mean few Palestinians can realistically expect to leave. Before Israel shut the crossing, some Palestinians had reported paying thousands of dollars when it was open, which few can afford.
The full reopening of the Rafah crossing was part of the first phase of the US-brokered ceasefire agreement that went into effect in mid-October. But Israel refused to open the crossing until the return of all living and deceased hostages. The final deceased hostage, Ran Gvili, was returned to Israel last week.
Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the opening would be “limited” with no passage of humanitarian aid or commercial goods.
The return of Gvili and the reopening of Rafah brings to a conclusion the first phase of the 20-point ceasefire agreement. The US announced the start of the second phase of the agreement two weeks ago when President Donald Trump officially launched his Board of Peace in Davos.
During the event, Ali Shaath, who leads the Palestinian technocratic committee expected to run Gaza, said the crossing would reopen, calling it “a lifeline and symbol of opportunity.”
• The Federal Reserve is widely expected to hold its benchmark interest rate steady Wednesday after its first policy meeting of 2026, as the labor market and inflation come into better balance.
• The central bank cut rates three times last year as it monitored the economic effects of President Donald Trump’s aggressive policies. Unemployment ticked up last year and inflation moved slightly lower.
• It’s also the first time we’ll hear from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell after his extraordinary rebuke of the Trump administration. He announced earlier this month that he is under federal investigation, saying the criminal probe is a “pretext” meant to intimidate the central bank into cutting rates to the president’s liking.
• Trump has said his pick for a new Fed chair to replace Powell, whose term ends in May, will slash rates. However, the chair is just one vote on a committee of 12 officials who make policy adjustments based on economic evidence, not political pressure.
Fed holds interest rates steady as its independence comes under threat
From Xenix News
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell during a news conference on September 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday kept interest rates unchanged as the US central bank fights to maintain its ability to set interest rates without political interference.
Officials kept their benchmark lending rate at a range of 3.5-3.75%, following three consecutive rate cuts late last year. Several policymakers have said in recent public speeches they want to see the effects of those rate cuts before considering any further reductions, suggesting a pause could last for a few months.
The Fed’s latest rate decision comes at a pivotal moment in the central bank’s 112-year history, as the Supreme Court reviews a case with significant implications for the Fed’s independence. Chair Jerome Powell himself pushed back against the Trump administration’s threats against the Fed’s independence earlier this month in a stunning video.
Yes, the labor market has weakened. No, that doesn’t guarantee a rate cut
From Xenix News
A job seeker waits to talk to a recruiter at a job fair on August 28, 2025, in Sunrise, Florida. Marta Lavandier/AP
Outside of recessions, last year was one of the weakest labor markets in decades. Additionally, the latest jobs report from December showed employers hired just 50,000 new workers — the most tepid job growth since December 2020, when employers laid off a net 183,000 workers.
On the surface, that, on top of other recent lackluster labor market data, would appear to make rate cuts a surefire thing for the Federal Reserve, given that it is tasked with setting rates at levels to promote maximum employment. (Generally speaking, lower rates can help boost the labor market by reducing employers’ borrowing costs, thereby freeing up funds to hire more workers.)
But the labor market is only half of the Fed’s responsibility; the other half is price stability (i.e. preventing higher inflation.) Cutting rates too quickly or by too much can help fuel higher inflation, especially at a time when higher tariffs and other factors are driving businesses to raise prices.
With both sides of the equation in mind, economists at Morgan Stanley anticipate the Fed will hold rates steady for longer than they previously forecast.
“Labor demand sill remains soft – with private payrolls rising by only 37k in December and 29k on a three-month moving average – but we think the Fed can live with slower employment growth so long as the unemployment rate is stable (or falling),” they said in a note earlier this month. Their expectation now is that the next rate cut will come in June.
Consumer confidence crisis?
From Xenix News
A customer shops in a supermarket in New York on January 22. Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images
America’s economic mood deteriorated in January to its lowest level in more than a decade as consumers fretted about geopolitical tensions, affordability and President Donald Trump’s unrelenting trade war.
Americans haven’t been in this bad of a mood about the economy since 2014, according to the closely watched Consumer Confidence Index. This month, the index fell 9.7 points to its lowest reading in nearly 12 years.
Put another way: Even in the depths of the 2020 pandemic, consumers were more confident about the economy than they are now, according to the index, which is published by the nonprofit think tank The Conference Board.
To be sure, these sentiment surveys tend to tell us more about what Americans believe than about how they truly are. In recent years, especially, the gap between what consumers say they’re feeling and how they’re actually spending their money has been widening.
So this sour January mood might not translate into less spending. A separate survey from the University of Michigan that emphasizes folks’ views about their personal finances hit a five-month high in January.
That might be why Wall Street was so unbothered by the confidence reading Tuesday. US stocks hit record highs thanks to plenty of optimism about corporate earnings.
President Donald Trump, pictured in Davos, Switzerland on Wednesday, has cast doubt on whether the United States’ allies would rally to its defense. Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images
US President Donald Trump has once again questioned whether NATO allies would “be there” if the United States “ever needed them,” baselessly claiming that the alliance’s troops “stayed a little back” from the frontlines in Afghanistan.
“I’ve always said, ‘Will they be there, if we ever needed them?’ And that’s really the ultimate test. And I’m not sure of that. I know that we would have been there, or we would be there, but will they be there?” Trump said Thursday in an interview with Fox News in Davos, Switzerland.
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the US became the first and so far only NATO member to invoke Article 5, which states that an attack against one member is an attack against all. For 20 years, NATO allies and other partner countries fought alongside US troops in Afghanistan – a sacrifice Trump has routinely downplayed.
“We’ve never needed them. We have never really asked anything of them. You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that. And they did – they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines,” he said.
President Trump says US has ‘never needed’ NATO and claims its troops avoided frontlines in Afghanistan
The president’s comments have rankled US allies in NATO, coming at the end of a week in which he has severely strained the alliance through his repeated threats to seize control of Greenland, an autonomous part of Denmark, another NATO member.
While in absolute terms the US lost by far the most troops of any NATO country in Afghanistan, some European countries – with much smaller populations than the US – lost almost as many troops in relative terms.
Around 3,500 allied troops died in the conflict, of which 2,456 were Americans and 457 were British. Denmark, with a population of around 5 million when the invasion began, lost more than 40 troops.
The force dispatched to the southern Helmand province – a Taliban stronghold and a center of opium production – initially comprised mostly British and Danish troops, before the US sent reinforcements in 2008. Britain and Denmark suffered most of their casualties in Helmand.
The coffins of two Danish soldiers killed in Helmand province were repatriated to a military airport in Jutland, Denmark, in October 2007. Claus Fisker/AFP/Getty Images
Since the turn of the year, Trump has repeatedly questioned NATO’s willingness to support the US. “I DOUBT NATO WOULD BE THERE FOR US IF WE REALLY NEEDED THEM,” he blasted on Truth Social on January 7. “We will always be there for NATO, even if they won’t be there for us.”
Before Trump’s comments to Fox News, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte had pushed back at the president’s previous attempts to diminish the alliance’s willingness to support the US.
“There was one thing I heard you say yesterday and today – you were not absolutely sure that Europeans would come to the rescue of the US if you will be attacked,” Rutte said Wednesday in Davos, sitting next to Trump. “Let me tell you – they will. And they did in Afghanistan, as you know.”
“For every two Americans who paid the ultimate price, there was one soldier from another NATO country that did not come back to his family,” Rutte said. “This is important. It pains me if you think it is not.”
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told Trump in Davos on Wednesday that allied troops had supported the US in Afghanistan. Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images
British lawmakers across the political spectrum were also outraged by Trump’s comments.
“NATO’s Article 5 has only been triggered once. The UK and NATO allies answered the US call. And more than 450 British personnel lost their lives in Afghanistan,” said Defense Secretary John Healey. “Those British troops should be remembered for who they were: heroes who gave their lives in service of our nation.”
Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, said Trump’s comments were an “absolute insult,” while Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the opposition Conservative Party, called them “flat-out nonsense,” saying that the allies’ sacrifice “deserves respect not denigration.”
Other members of the Trump administration have also made light of the sacrifices made by NATO allies in Afghanistan. In June, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said his fellow US troops in Afghanistan would joke that the ISAF acronym on their shoulder patches – which stood for International Security Assistance Force – actually stood for “I Saw Americans Fighting.”
“What ultimately was a lot of flags … was not a lot of on the ground capability,” Hegseth said, disparaging the efforts of NATO allies.
• Ukraine talks: After meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, US President Donald Trump said there’s still “a ways to go” on ending Russia’s war. Zelensky noted that documents aimed at stopping the conflict are “nearly ready” and also called out Europe for inaction.
• Greenland deal progress: Trump said negotiations regarding Greenland currently give US “total access” for defense. While Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte reached a verbal understanding about Greenland yesterday, no document has been produced yet memorializing a future deal, sources say.
• “Board of Peace”: Trump earlier unveiled his “Board of Peace,” which is tasked with rebuilding Gaza and resolving global conflicts, in a signing ceremony attended by fewer than 20 countries. He called Gaza a “beautiful piece of property” when talking about reconstruction of the war-torn strip.Allcatch upgreenlandukrainedavos
Greenland’s prime minister says sovereignty is a “red line” in any deal
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said Thursday that he wasn’t sure “what’s concrete” in US President Donald Trump’s announced “framework” for a “future deal” on Greenland.
“Nobody else than Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark have the mandate to make deals or agreements about Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark without us,” Nielsen told Xenix News Nic Robertson at a press conference in Nuuk.
Trump yesterday announced that he had achieved the new “framework” after a meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Nielsen said he understood that at that meeting, Rutte “delivered the message that we actually have delivered a couple of days ago with our representative from the government of Greenland.”
“I don’t know what’s concrete in that deal,” Nielsen said of Trump’s new framework, “but I know that we have now a high-level working group working on a solution for both parties.”
Greenland’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is a “red line,” Nielsen continued. Earlier in the press conference, he told reporters that Greenland’s position is clear.
“To summarize, we choose the Kingdom of Denmark,” Nielsen said. “We choose the EU, we choose NATO. This is not only a situation for Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark, it’s about the world order for all of us.”
Ukraine, US and Russia will hold trilateral meeting in UAE starting Friday, Zelensky says
Ukrainian, US and Russian officials are to hold a trilateral meeting in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced Thursday, in a sign that peace talks to end the war in Ukraine are intensifying.
The two-day meeting will take place on Friday and Saturday, the Ukrainian leader said as he delivered a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Speaking to reporters later, Zelensky revealed that the Ukrainian delegation will include the head and deputy head of his presidential office, Kyrylo Budanov and Serhii Kyslytsia; the head of the parliamentary faction of Zelensky’s Servant of the People party and negotiator, David Arakhamia; and the Chief of the General Staff Andrii Hnatov.
“I asked Hnatov to fly in from Kyiv; the military must be present,” Zelensky told the reporters.
“We are at the moment when, I think, if all the sides will work a lot, we will end this war, but if somebody will play the games, I don’t know who, but I’m just sharing with you. If someone will play games, the war will continue,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Analysis: A strident Zelensky seeks to spur European allies into action
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky delivers a speech at the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday. Markus Schreiber/AP
This was a very strident broadside by Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky against European leaders he says have not done enough over the past year. They remain, he said, “in Greenland mode, maybe someone, somewhere will do something.”
Zelensky thanked France and the UK for offering troops in the event of a peace deal, but otherwise tried to stir European leaders – still reeling from US President Donald Trump’s whirlwind of noise around Greenland – into action to forge a new world order. “We need something to replace the old world order with, but where are the leaders to do that?” he said.
Zelensky revealed plans for US, Russian and Ukrainian leaders to meet in the United Arab Emirates in the coming days, for what would mark the first trilateral meeting since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Trump had floated such an idea late last year – and Russia rejected it. That it is now likely happening might suggest some progress in peace talks, if only on the procedural front.
The speech’s tone – defiant against a part of Europe that has been Zelensky’s key support base – was designed to appeal to the White House. Parts of it would have pleased both US Vice-President JD Vance and Trump himself. But it was also designed to use the embarrassment and vertigo of the Greenland crisis to urge sedentary European leaders into real action.
Zelensky was complimentary about how Trump’s snatching of Venezuela’s former president Nicolas Maduro led to him facing trial in New York. But he reminded Europeans that Russia’s President Vladimir Putin did not face a similar fate, and that the people of Iran had been left to face the brutality of their security forces. He danced around the issue of US weapons supplies, saying he had discussed air defenses with Trump, but that he had been advised not to mention the US Tomahawk missiles Ukraine urgently wants.
Zelensky wanted to leave a mark on his European hosts that Trump would appreciate and convey the idea that the peace process has momentum, saying the documents were “almost ready.”
The answer to the key question of whether Putin will sign up to them likely leans towards the negative.
No written document has been produced on future deal framework for Greenland, sources say
US President Donald Trump, right, meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte during a meeting on the sidelines of the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Wednesday. Evan Vucci/AP
President Donald Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte reached a verbal understanding about Greenland during their meeting yesterday, but no document has been produced yet memorializing a future deal, people familiar with their discussion told Xenix News.
Trump and Rutte agreed to further discussions about updating a 1951 agreement between the US, Denmark and Greenland that governs the US military’s presence on the island, the sources said. The deal framework also guarantees that Russia and China will be barred from any investments in Greenland and lays out an enhanced role for NATO in Greenland, they said.
Two sources said another element of a possible deal is increased US access to Greenland’s natural resources. Rutte on Thursday denied that he had discussed this issue with Trump directly.
One person familiar with the discussions said Rutte did not want any formal documents prepared during his meeting with Trump because he was concerned they could leak — or be posted by Trump himself on social media. Trump earlier this week posted a private message Rutte sent to him ahead of their talks.
The lack of any written documentation has caused some confusion among NATO allies about what was actually agreed upon.
Stacked shipping containers in the commercial port of Barcelona on July 7, 2025. Angel Garcia/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Strasbourg, France —
A key group of European Parliament members blocked a vote to ratify a US-European trade deal Wednesday after President Donald Trump threatened to take over Greenland and charge as much as an additional 35% tariff on countries opposed to his ambitions.
“EU-US Deal on ice indefinitely!” Bernd Lange, chair of Parliament’s trade committee, said in a post on X.
It’s unclear if the entire trade agreement, which called for 15% tariffs on European Union goods shipping to the US, has been called off or if parts that have already gone into effect will remain that way. The EU and the US came to a preliminary deal in July, putting much of it into effect before it was signed.
The news came as Trump told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland that he did not intend to use force to acquire Greenland. But he emphasized repeatedly a demand that Europe effectively give Greenland to the United States.
“He wants to have Greenland as part of the United States as quick as possible, and he wants to have a table where we could discuss about the price he wants to buy,” Lange said Wednesday at a press conference in Strasbourg, France.
Beyond the 15% tariff rate, the agreement called for the EU to increase purchases of American agricultural and energy products. Lange accused the US of violating the terms of the agreement by threatening additional tariffs.
“Until the threats are over, so there will be no possibility for compromise,” Lange added. He seemed to suggest, though, that the EU’s commitments to purchase American military and energy products will stick.
Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland triggered an emergency meeting of European countries’ representatives over the weekend, and French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly asked the European Union to activate its so-called anti-coercion instrument, colloquially known as a “trade bazooka.” That could involve suspending US company licenses or taxing US services.
Collectively, trade between the US and EU was nearly $1 trillion in 2024, according to data from the US Commerce Department. A trade war between the two economies could have profound impacts for all involved.
EU leaders are set to meet in Brussels on Thursday to discuss how to retaliate if Trump’s latest tariff threats are enacted.
But Trump’s ability to follow through on his tariff threat likely hinges upon a case now before the Supreme Court challenging his most sweeping levies. The nation’s highest court is expected to issue a ruling soon.
This story has been updated with additional context and developments.
• US President Donald Trump tied his ambitions to annex Greenland to his unsuccessful bid for a Nobel Peace Prize in an extraordinary message to Norway’s prime minister. Trump said he no longer feels bound “to think purely of Peace.”
NATO, Denmark and Greenland discuss importance of Arctic for “collective security”
From Xenix News Billy Stockwell
NATO will continue to work with Denmark and Greenland on matters relating to the security of the Arctic region, the military alliance’s Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Monday.
His comments follow a meeting with Denmark’s Minister of Defense Troels Lund Poulsen and Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt.
“We discussed how important the Arctic – including Greenland – is to our collective security and how (Denmark) is stepping up investments in key capabilities,” he posted on X. “We’ll continue to work together as allies on these important issues.”
Europe doesn’t want a “fight” over Greenland, but will hold its ground, says EU foreign policy chief
From Xenix News Billy Stockwell
Europe is not interested in picking a “fight” with the US overj President Donald Trump’s ambitions to annex Greenland, but the bloc will “hold our ground,” according to the EU’s foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas.
“We have no interest to pick a fight, but we will hold our ground. Europe has a slate of tools to protect its interests,” Kallas said in a social post Monday.
Trump’s threat to hit his allies with tariffs unless a deal is reached for the US purchase of Greenland is “not the way to go about this,” Kallas said.
“Denmark and Greenland are not alone,” she said. “Arctic security is a shared transatlantic interest, and one we can discuss with our US allies.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“There are red lines which can’t be crossed,” says Danish foreign minister
From Xenix News Billy Stockwell
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen said there are “red lines which can’t be crossed,” referencing US President Donald Trump’s aspirations to acquire Greenland. However, he added that he has no intention of escalating the situation.
He said he believed the United Kingdom and the European Union would stand behind Denmark, citing the “strong statement” of support from British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Starmer said earlier Monday that it’s “completely wrong” to impose tariffs on allies and reaffirmed that any decision about the future status of Greenland “belongs to the people of Greenland.”
Asked if he felt betrayed by the US, Rasmussen said Monday: “I use the word surprised… I have no intention to escalate things.”
“It’s so important that all our allies in the NATO alliance, European Union, stand up for these principles to show the American president you have a desire, you have a vision, you have a request, but you will never be able to achieve that by putting pressure on us,” Rasmussen said.
US President Donald Trump welcomes Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida, on Sunday. Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images
By Xenix News | Exclusive Preliminary Update
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is anticipated to engage with the US president in the near future for critical talks centered on the conflict in Ukraine, as per sources knowledgeable about the arrangements. The expected meeting occurs amid ongoing clashes on various fronts and increasing diplomatic pressure to consider possible avenues for resolving the conflict.
Xenix News has discovered that arrangements for the discussions are currently in progress, with high-ranking officials from both parties describing the meeting as a pivotal opportunity to reevaluate strategy, military support, and enduring security assurances. Although expectations are still wary, the meeting indicates a revival of diplomatic efforts amid quickly changing battlefield dynamics and political strategies.
The meeting provides the Trump administration a chance to define its stance on the conflict and its overall perspective on security in Europe. For Zelensky, this presents an opportunity to advocate for Ukraine, highlighting the repercussions of ongoing Russian hostility and the necessity of ongoing global support.
Officials emphasize that no formal agreement is anticipated right away. Rather, the negotiations are viewed as a strategic recalibration — one that may influence the upcoming stage of US-Ukraine relations.
The gathering is being arranged amid ongoing violence in Ukraine, featuring missile strikes, drone assaults, and heavy combat along disputed front lines. Ukrainian officials indicate that Russia has displayed minimal signs of reducing its military operations, hindering diplomatic attempts.
Zelensky has consistently emphasized that Ukraine welcomes talks aimed at enhancing peace and security but will reject agreements that compromise its sovereignty or territorial integrity. The US president has indicated a willingness to consider diplomatic avenues while managing political pressures at home and maintaining foreign alliances.
Experts indicate that the timing of the gathering is important. Questions arise regarding the sustainability of military assistance, growing war fatigue in Western populations, and the potential for escalation beyond Ukraine’s borders.
“A foreign policy expert stated, ‘This concerns more than just Ukraine.’” “It concerns the reliability of US leadership and the future of the global order.”
Implications of the Zelensky–US President Meeting for the Conflict
Although specifics of the agenda are kept confidential, officials suggest that several important issues are expected to take center stage in the discussions.
Support for military operations and assurances for security
Ukraine is anticipated to advocate for ongoing military support, especially in the form of air defense systems and munitions. Zelensky contends that strong support reduces the duration of the war by enhancing Ukraine’s leverage in negotiations.
The US side is expected to evaluate how assistance corresponds with larger strategic objectives and domestic factors, particularly as political discussions escalate domestically.
Diplomatic routes
The discussions might also investigate if there is a practical chance for negotiations with Russia. Earlier efforts have halted due to reciprocal mistrust and conflicting requirements.
A key issue persists: is it possible for diplomacy to advance amid ongoing conflict?
Inquiries and Responses: What We Have Learned Thus Far
What is the reason for this meeting taking place at this time?
The timing signifies increasing pressure to reevaluate the war’s course and consider diplomatic alternatives amidst the continuing conflict.
Is a ceasefire going to be declared?
A ceasefire is not anticipated in the near future. Officials characterize the gathering as investigative instead of conclusive.
What role does Russia play in the discussions?
Russia is not directly participating, yet its actions will significantly affect any results.
Might US policy shift following the meeting?
Although significant changes are not expected suddenly, the conversations may influence upcoming choices regarding assistance and diplomacy.
A careful moment of potential
For Ukrainians, the possibility of high-level discussions evokes a blend of optimism and doubt. Some worry that diplomacy might result in demands for difficult compromises, while others view it as an essential move toward stopping years of violence.
In Washington, the gathering highlights the difficulty of reconciling principles with practical politics. Backing Ukraine has emerged as a pivotal matter for US foreign policy, yet it also entails political and economic expenses.
Xenix News recognizes that both parties are acutely conscious of the risks involved. The language arising from initial talks highlights realism, prudence, and the necessity to handle expectations.
“One diplomat involved stated, ‘This is as much about listening as it is about talking.’” “ grasping what can be done — and what cannot.”
With global attention, the impending meeting between Zelensky and the US president might not produce immediate successes. However, it might signify a pivotal moment in the way the conflict is talked about, handled, and eventually settled.
At present, the combat zone continues to be lively, the negotiations unpredictable, and the conclusion ambiguous. The mere reality that leaders are getting ready to meet implies that, despite the conflict, the quest for a path ahead persists.
• Epstein documents: The Justice Department unveiled a heavily censored collection of documents yesterday concerning the Jeffrey Epstein inquiry. It did not disclose all the documents, as requested in the legislation enacted last month. Certain survivors voiced their annoyance while attempting to obtain details regarding their individual cases.
• Trump’s address: In another location, President Donald Trump delivered a rambling address in North Carolina, addressing the economy while often diverging into unrelated topics. Previously, he revealed pricing agreements with nine pharmaceutical firms in his recent attempt to reduce medication expenses.
• Middle East attacks: Yesterday, the US military targeted several ISIS-connected sites in Syria, as reported by two US officials. The assault realized Trump’s promise to retaliate for the recent deaths of two American soldiers in the nation.
Handwritten phone notes included in latest documents made public by DOJ.
From Xenix News Kaanita Iyer
Among the documents released by the DOJ overnight are several handwritten phone slips for Epstein, including one that states, “She has a female friend for you.” “Kindly return the call at your earliest convenience.”
Several other messages reference an individual having a “female” for Epstein, but the names on the slips, apart from Epstein’s, have been censored, leaving it uncertain who the messages originated from.
One message note suggests that now-President Donald Trump requested Epstein, but there is no detail on the reason for the call or when the message was recorded. Trump’s link to Epstein has been known for some time, although the US president has refuted any misconduct regarding Epstein.
Justice Department unveils additional Epstein documents overnight.
From Xenix News Kaanita Iyer, Holmes Lybrand, and Marshall Cohen
The recently published documents feature grand jury materials from the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases, comprising grand jury testimonies and flight logs with numerous names obscured.
Federal judges recently permitted the Justice Department to disclose grand jury materials — which usually stay sealed even post-case — due to Congress’ recent enactment of the Epstein Files Transparency Act last month.
This recent release features the PowerPoint slides that federal prosecutors presented to grand jurors while attempting to obtain indictments against Epstein and Maxwell. It seems that this is the initial occasion these slideshows have been made publicly available by the Justice Department.
The 32-slide Epstein presentation from June 2019, featuring redactions, revealed to grand jurors Epstein’s properties, notes regarding women, financial dealings, and travel records. The two distinct presentations for the Maxwell grand jury include images of her with Epstein, flight records, and excerpts from Maxwell’s previous testimony.
The recent disclosures also feature statements from an FBI agent who testified before the grand jury that issued an indictment against Epstein in 2019. The agent explains that a 14-year-old girl, as mentioned by the agent, left school after her ninth grade before she came into contact with Epstein.
“She encountered a girl,” the agent stated, “who informed her that she could earn money by massaging this wealthy man.” The girl’s name has been removed.
The agent elaborates to the grand jury about the shocking methods Epstein allegedly used to sexually exploit the young girl, as well as how additional girls were brought in to perpetuate the cycle, with one girl reportedly delivering “20 to 50” girls for Epstein.
The reason for the Justice Department releasing this set of materials separately from the prior disclosures on Friday during the night remains uncertain. High-ranking DOJ officials have indicated for weeks that these documents would be included in the release of the “Epstein files,” and the DOJ even tried to present them in court in August unsuccessfully before Congress enacted the new law.
Stay updated on additional happenings from the Trump administration.
Along with the release of additional Epstein documents, the past 24 hours in Washington have been quite hectic. Here’s a summary of the most recent updates:
Yesterday, the US executed airstrikes in Syria following an assault that resulted in the deaths of two American soldiers earlier this month. President Donald Trump stated he had directed a “massive strike” against ISIS members in Syria, labeling it as “very successful.” “It was precision.” “We successfully reached every location, and we are reestablishing tranquility through power,” he stated.
To reduce medication expenses, Trump announced “Most Favored Nation” pricing agreements with nine additional pharmaceutical firms. The initiative requires pharmaceutical companies to set the prices of drugs sold in the US at the lowest rates found in comparable nations.
A Russian representative is anticipated to confer with US envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Miami in the following days, a Russian source verified to Xenix News yesterday. Kiril Dmitriev, the special envoy of President Putin, is anticipated to receive an update on the revised peace proposals aimed at resolving the Ukraine conflict.
A tanker sanctioned by the United States entered Venezuelan waters yesterday, according to ship tracking data, even though Trump had previously announced a “total and complete blockade” on vessels passing through the country. The vessel registered under the Gambian flag was spotted close to a refinery at Venezuela’s Amuay Bay, as indicated by ship tracking information.
In a lengthy speech in North Carolina yesterday, Trump promised to inform the nation if his health deteriorates. “When the moment arrives, I will inform you about it.” “You’re likely to learn about it simply by observing,” he stated. “However, that moment is not currently, as I experience the same feelings I have had for 50 years.”
• Economic claims: Officials in the US administration contend that the economic policies of President Donald Trump are starting to show effects, even amidst significant voter dissatisfaction regarding living expenses. Trump affirmed his economic record during a nationwide speech last night, claiming it is a triumph.
• Inflation report: The government is also highlighting a new inflation data release, indicating that inflation has decreased to 2.7%. Nevertheless, economists warn that the significantly lower reading might be due to distortions related to shutdowns.
• Marijuana order: Sources indicate that Trump is anticipated to sign an executive order today that will reclassify marijuana, a step that would relax federal restrictions.
• Epstein files: The Justice Department must release a large collection of investigative documents concerning Jeffrey Epstein by tomorrow.
Improved Obamacare subsidies are scheduled to end at the close of the month. Here’s the current situation.
From CNN’s Sarah Ferris, Tami Luhby, Ellis Kim, and Maureen Chowdhury.
The improved premium subsidies of the Affordable Care Act are anticipated to expire at the end of the year, causing premiums to rise dramatically for millions of Americans in the new year.
Though the House is anticipated to vote in January on a Democratic plan to prolong them for three years, the initiative encounters considerable challenges in the Senate.
In the meantime, House Republicans passed a slim package yesterday by a vote of 216-211. The strategy aims to reduce health care expenses for certain Americans in the next few years but overlooks the ending enhanced Obamacare subsidies.
The proposal will be forwarded to the Senate, where a vote is unlikely to take place before lawmakers depart Washington for the holiday break.
Here’s what to understand regarding the conflict over health care subsidies:
GOP approves limited health care proposal: Speaker Mike Johnson and his associates took a strong approach in advocating for their health care proposal, which would enable small businesses and self-employed individuals to unite across various sectors to purchase coverage via association health plans to reduce premiums. It would additionally allocate federal funding for the cost-sharing subsidies that lower-income Obamacare participants receive to decrease their deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses for care.
A group of centrist Republicans breaks away: A faction of House GOP centrists, headed by Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and Mike Lawler, executed a bold maneuver against Johnson—agreeing to support Democrats in effectively taking control of the Republican agenda by compelling a vote on their own legislation regarding the impending Obamacare subsidies crisis.
At the same time, health care expenses are projected to rise dramatically for millions: If the boosted subsidies expire, participants will experience an average increase of 114% in their yearly premium payments — around $1,000 — in 2026, as per KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research organization. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that approximately 2 million additional individuals will likely be uninsured next year if the subsidies are discontinued
Donald Trump poses with a group of women, in this picture released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee Friday. The panel redacted the faces of the women. House Oversight Democrats
In a situation that has already caused significant political uproar, Xenix News has exclusively discovered, via newly revealed documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, that a collection of previously unexamined photographs showcasing Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Bill Clinton, and various other notable figures has been made public as part of ongoing congressional and public-records releases.
Although none of the pictures demonstrate any misconduct, the timing and prominence of the individuals depicted have heightened discussions regarding the extent of Epstein’s connections and the power he previously held among international elites.
The images, as per those acquainted with the estate evaluation procedure, were part of a broader assembly of thousands of archived items — numerous ones of which have not been publicly scrutinized until this moment.
A Fresh Batch of Photos Reignites Focus on Epstein’s Inner Circle
Within the Recently Unveiled Images: What They Display — and What Remains Unseen
A source associated with the review team stated that the recently revealed photographs differ significantly in context. Certain photos seem to have been captured during social events, fundraising activities, or exclusive gatherings held at Epstein’s residences in New York, Palm Beach, and the Virgin Islands. Some images are said to date back over twenty years, while others seem to originate from the early 2010s.
Experts note that it’s not the photos’ content that attracts attention, but the array of prominent figures featured in them. Previous presidents, political strategists, investors, technology leaders, and entertainment personalities all appear in fragments of Epstein’s social records.
Do the images suggest illegal behavior?
No. Numerous legal experts highlight that the inclusion of public figures in images with Epstein does not constitute evidence of wrongdoing. Numerous pictures show public occasions, fundraising activities, or assemblies where Epstein was just one of many.
So, what makes the release noteworthy?
The images relate to the larger inquiry surrounding the Epstein files: How did a single individual create connections within some of the most influential organizations globally?
And even more crucially: Who had knowledge of what — and at what time?
Political Consequences Grow in Washington
The latest set of photos comes in as congressional committees keep examining the remaining estate documents, such as depositions, travel records, visitor lists, calendars, and sealed communications. For numerous legislators, the recent images renew calls for greater transparency regarding Epstein’s activities.
A high-ranking Democratic staff member informed Xenix News that although the pictures by themselves “don’t shift the legal scale,” they do “depict a larger narrative of influence that needs to be analyzed with complete honesty.”
Republican legislators, on the other hand, have released statements advising the public against forming hasty conclusions. A GOP member described the release as “a diversion from current legal issues that ought to be addressed with caution, not used as a political tool.”
Yet, with figures such as Trump and Clinton reappearing in discussions, the content is highly likely to echo in the political sphere.
Question&Answer: What We Have Learned So Far
Question: What is the total number of photos that have been made public?
Answer: The precise figure is still uncertain. Sources indicate that “several dozen” images are included in the initial release, with many hundreds still undergoing processing.
Answer: Lawyers designated in the estate administration procedure, technical archivists, and a congressional records group managing public-interest announcements.
Question: Will additional images be anticipated?
Answer: Affirmative. The most recent release is labeled as “preliminary,” with more batches anticipated as documents are subject to redaction and legal
Negative. Multiple legal experts highlight that the existence of public figures in images alongside Epstein does not prove wrongdoing. Numerous pictures show public occasions, fundraising events, or assemblies featuring Epstein as just one among many.
Why is the release important?
The images contribute to the larger inquiry surrounding the Epstein files: How did a single individual establish connections within some of the most influential institutions globally?
And most crucially: Who else was aware of what — and at what time?
Political Consequences Escalate Throughout Washington
The latest set of photos comes in while congressional committees keep examining the remaining estate documents, such as depositions, travel records, visitor lists, calendars, and confidential correspondence. For many legislators, the recent images revive calls for greater transparency regarding Epstein’s activities.
Republican legislators, on the other hand, have released statements encouraging the public not to jump to early conclusions. A GOP member described the release as “a diversion from current legal issues that need careful handling rather than being used as a political tool.”
However, with names such as Trump and Clinton coming back into discussions, the topic will likely resonate in the political sphere.
Preguntas y Respuestas: Lo Que Sabemos Hasta Ahora
Question: What is the total number of photos that have been published?
Answer: The precise figure is not clear. Reports indicate that “dozens” of pictures are included in the initial release, with several hundred more still under evaluation.
Question: Who assessed the pictures?
Answer: Lawyers designated for the estate management process, technical archivists, and a congressional records team monitoring public-interest disclosures.
Question: Should we anticipate additional images?
Answer: Indeed. The recent release is termed “preliminary,” and further batches are anticipated as documents go through redaction and legal approval.
Question: Are the people in the pictures reacting?
Answer: The majority of offices chose not to comment. Previous statements from Trump and Clinton have highlighted restricted engagements with Epstein.
Specialists Indicate Context Will Be Crucial
Legal analysts consulted by Xenix News emphasize the importance of context prior to making inferences regarding the significance of the images.
“Photographs reveal who attended, but they don’t convey the circumstances or the discussions that took place,” stated a former federal prosecutor. “While these releases can contribute to the public record, they do not substitute for investigative efforts.”
The specialist mentioned that prominent figures frequently participate in the same events without stronger connections. “In political, charitable, and corporate realms, intersections are frequent.”
Within Epstein’s Network: Unresolved Questions Remain
For both investigators and journalists, the images provoke just as many inquiries as they clarify:
A previous intelligence officer informed Xenix News that the images illustrate “the environment Epstein functioned within — a network of ties that includes politics, finance, academia, and entertainment.”
Additional images, guest lists, and internal messages from Epstein’s residences are anticipated to be made public in the upcoming months. Congressional committees are said to be preparing for more hearings investigating how Epstein established and safeguarded his network over the years.
Currently, the recently revealed photos are the clearest indication that the Epstein files might keep altering political narratives in Washington and elsewhere — particularly as the country approaches another election season.
Xenix News will keep tracking developments as additional releases come out
