With the escalation of the conflict in Gaza and increasing international criticism of Israel’s military operations, a significant change is happening within the Democratic Party. Pro-Israel Democrats—historical advocates of the U.S.-Israel partnership—are striving to separate themselves from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to maintain bipartisan backing for Israel and limit the party’s growing association with Palestinian sympathies.
The Democratic Party, which used to be almost unanimously supportive of Israel, is currently experiencing significant internal discord. Progressive legislators, such as those from the “Squad,” have vigorously condemned Israel’s military actions in Gaza, labeling them as excessive and urging for a ceasefire, humanitarian support, and in certain instances, a halt to U.S. military aid.
In response, moderate and pro-Israel Democrats are attempting to maintain a careful balance While reaffirming Israel’s right to self-defense, they have begun to critique Netanyahu’s far-right administration—especially its contentious judicial reforms, growth of settlements, and management of the Gaza situation. Legislators such as Senator Chris Coons and Representative Gregory Meeks stress that backing for Israel does not equate to uncritical agreement with Netanyahu’s political aims.
The increasing gap between backing for the Israeli state and disapproval of its current leaders seeks to protect U.S. assistance to Israel from rising dissent within the Democratic base. As younger and more diverse voters grow increasingly critical of Israel’s policies regarding Palestinians, these Democrats worry that unwavering support might further estrange vital constituencies and promote a wider party transition toward the Palestinian issue.
Additionally, Netanyahu’s strong ties to right-wing American politics and his previous friendship with former President Donald Trump have complicated Democrats’ ability to justify his actions among themselves.
His apparent opposition to peace negotiations and indifferent attitude toward a two-state solution have exacerbated tensions with Washington’s Democratic leaders. Pro-Israel Democrats are balancing precariously—seeking to maintain bipartisan backing for Israel while recognizing the ethical and humanitarian issues highlighted by the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
Their approach seems to emphasize creating a clear separation: it is possible to back Israel’s existence and safety without agreeing with Netanyahu’s leadership or policies. Essentially, these Democrats believe that by openly distancing themselves from Netanyahu, they can shield U.S.-Israel relations from turning into another dividing issue amidst America’s escalating political divide—particularly as Gaza remains in turmoil and international anger grows.
About the Author
